UK’s Independent on Sunday – “Thousands of teenage girls enduring debilitating illnesses after routine school cancer vaccination”

When Caron Ryalls was asked to sign consent forms so that her then 13-year-old daughter, Emily, could be vaccinated against cervical cancer, she assumed it was the best way to protect Emily’s long-term health.

Yet the past four years have turned into a nightmare for the family as Emily soon suffered side effects. Only two weeks after her first HPV injection, the teenager experienced dizziness and nausea.

The symptoms grew increasingly worse after the second and third injections, and I went to A&E several times with severe chest and abdominal pains as well as difficulty breathing,” Emily, now 17, said. “One time I couldn’t move anything on one side of my body. I didn’t know what was happening.

Emily is one of the thousands of teenage girls who have endured debilitating illnesses following the routine immunisation. She is yet to recover and has no idea when her health will return to normal.

Prior to the vaccination Emily had an ‘unremarkable’ medical history with no problems,” said Mrs Ryalls, 49, from in Ossett, West Yorkshire. “She was considered very healthy and represented the school at hockey, netball, athletics and was a keen dancer. She was also a high achiever at school, in the top sets for everything and predicted at least 10 GCSE with high grades. Her future was very bright.

Read rest of story from Independent on Sunday:

Thousands of teenage girls enduring debilitating illnesses after routine school cancer vaccination

More Evidence Hepatitis B Vaccines Cause Multiple Sclerosis [amongst other serious conditions]

In its issue of October 20, 2014, JAMA Neurol published a paper “Vaccines and the risk of multiple sclerosis and other central nervous system demyelinating disease” (doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.2633).

In accordance with my previous criticism regarding the methodological reliability of most studies presented as confirming the safety of vaccines, this investigation [1] raises a number of serious concerns.

Case ascertainment – Whereas the study title makes special emphasis on multiple sclerosis (MS: ICD code 340), case identification includes no less than nine ICD codes, some of which (optic neuritis or acute disseminated encephalomyelitis being sometimes difficult to differentiate from genuine MS, whereas others [transverse myelitis] are generally considered as distinct). The most expected result of such a diagnosis blending is to weaken statistical power and to blur epidemiological evidence.

Vaccination assessment – Only 4.0% of the 3885 controls were exposed to hepatitis B vaccine in the 3 years before the index rate; this may be compared with the study by Hernan et al. [2] (the design of which was fairly similar), where 2,4% of the 1565 controls were exposed to a recombinant hepatitis B vaccine. The trouble is that this immunization was highly selective in the latter population (UK), whereas it was massive in the former (USA). In spite of this major discrepancy in the vaccine policy between the two countries, the surprisingly small difference between these two percentages raises the hypothesis that, for one reason or another, vaccination recording was incomplete in the American sample. Although duly pointed out as remarkable by Langer-Gould et al., low vaccine exposure in their sample was not seriously discussed by the authors.

Control selection – Although a black ethnicity was the most prominent risk factor identified by the authors in their previous study on the incidence of demyelinating syndromes (quoted as reference 17 in their current paper), one may wonder why their control selection did not include race in their matching method. As it happens, imbalance in the distribution of black race between cases and controls was the most striking feature of the baseline samples characteristics.

Index date – Although the timing of symptoms appearance is generally a crucial argument for causality in drug monitoring (there may be exceptions to this rule), this parameter is never properly considered in investigations devoted to post-vaccine MS. Actually, as the disease may remain clinically silent for years, the relevant parameter is neither the date of diagnosis nor that of the late symptoms which lead to the investigations leading to positive diagnosis. In spite of this, what investigators mean by “symptoms onset date” is never clearly defined: which symptoms? For example, in their abovementioned reference 17 (Table 1), Langer-Gould et al. estimated at 0.9 month the median time from symptom onset to diagnosis, after having stipulated that, defining MS required two or more episodes of MS “separated in time”: is unlikely that 0.9 month is a sufficient time interval to separate two distinct MS episodes… At the opposite side of the clinical spectrum, the very first symptoms of a MS are often an unexplained fatigue, mild paresthesia, etc. the onset of which may be quite close to the time of vaccine injection (a few days or weeks), but which may last for years before onset of more significant symptoms: thus, if one focus on the late significant symptoms, this very long time lag is almost always interpreted as speaking against a vaccine role whereas, when considering the whole of symptoms sequence from its very beginning (i.e. from the time of quite discrete symptoms just after injection), it is on the contrary highly suggestive of a vaccine causality. I have never seen this crucial problem properly taken into account in any database, so that most investigations about the time between vaccination and the onset of MS symptoms are essentially misleading.

Regarding MS and in spite of their denials, the authors ended up to a result very close to that of Hernan et al.’s., namely an overrepresentation of cases (4.2%) as compared to the controls (3.1%) within a time windows of 3 years. Of course, this difference just failed to reach statistical significance but: i) as documented above, the methodological tendency of the authors contributed to decrease the power of their results; ii) amongst the published case/control studies supposed to exclude a post-vaccine risk of MS (by means of like strategies of dilution of the cases or of insufficient observation period), the number of those suggesting (even in a nonsignificant way) an overrepresentation of cases in vaccinated subjects is clearly higher than those suggesting an underrepresentation, and the difference between the two groups of studies is clearly significant from a statistical point of view.

Finally and as with most papers devoted to the safety of hepatitis B vaccines, the authors cannot refrain from concluding that no “change in vaccine policy” is warranted: yet, their investigation is totally devoid of the slightest element likely to validate any vaccine policy, whose potential shortcomings (included issues of cost, of resources allocation, of individual and collective efficacy, of nonneurological risks, etc.) go far beyond the sole issue of MS. In psychoanalysis, such optimism (going far beyond the available evidence from a given investigation) is called “the return of the repressed”…

[1] Langer-Gould A, Qian L, Tartof SY, Brara SM, Jacobsen SJ, Beaber BE, et al. Vaccines and the risk of multiple sclerosis and other central nervous system demyelinating diseases. JAMA Neurol. 2014 Dec;71(12):1506-13.

[2] Neurology 2004; 63: 838-42.

The Money and Criminal Connections Behind The Vaccine Racket – How Vaccines Your Child Does Not Need Get Mandated – How Serious Ill Health and Death Are Not Reported Publicly

The chart below from Natural neatly summarises the way some drug companies like GSK [including some which have criminal convictions such as for fraudulent marketing and selling of dangerous drugs] use money to manipulate politicians, universities, the media, medical professionals and the public to expand the ever increasing burden of vaccines one too many of which do cause serious ill health and/or death.  What the chart does not show is the high levels of under-reporting of adverse vaccine reactions and the manipulation of adverse reaction data to hide the data showing the scale of serious adverse reactions.  See also below the links to just a few of the previous relevant CHS articles.


How Drug Company Money is Used to Push Vaccines Which Have Killed and/or Injured Childre

The Vaccine Racket

Here are a few of the relevant previous CHS articles:

GSK Fined US$3 BILLION – largest health fraud settlement in U.S. history

UK Drug Safety Agency Falsified Vaccine Safety Data For 6 Million

Commercially Corrupted Medicine Leading Cause of Death in USA – Washington Post

More US CDC Research Fraud – Publishing False Figures to Promote A Pointless Vaccine to The US and Third World

US Prosecutors Seek Extradition of Madsen MMR/Autism Denmark Study Author for US$1m MMR & Mercury Autism Research Fraud

Proof Some Docs, Drug Companies, Politicians & Government Officials Work To Make Your Kids Sick – To Get Your MONEY – News From NY USA Charity AHRP

More Fraud From Drug Giant GlaxoSmithKline Companies – Court Documents Show

UK General Medical Council Told Docs “Commit Fraud for MMR Vaccine Bonuses”

More Fraud By Drug Giant Merck – US$650 Million

The Issues Explained For You – Senior Centers for Disease Contol Scientist Admits CDC Knew MMR Vaccine Causes Autism For Over 10 Years And Fabricated Research To Hide This – Interview With Jon Rappoport

Congressman “CDC Should Be Investigated” – US Centers for Disease Control Vaccine Safety Corruption Compared to Bernie Madoff

Paid Ghostwriters Write Wikipedia On Behalf of Paying Clients – Confirmed by Wikimedia Foundation Legal Department

W.H.O. Ensures Third World Child Vaccine Deaths Will Not Be Recorded – New Weakened W.H.O. Criteria For Third World Child Deaths From Vaccines

Patient Committed Suicide After His Doctor Was Hounded By Dr Ben Goldacre’s Badscience Forum Internet Bullies – Perpetrator’s Mild Two Year Cautionary Sentence Only Just Ended December 2013

Whooping Cough Vaccine – Doesn’t Work – GSK Says “We Never Bothered to Check”

 Unsafe Vaccines & Corruption In Medical Journal Publishing


The US Centers for Disease Control – #1 Enemy of the US People – Does More Harm To US Citizens Than Terrorists – [Including Al Quaeda and ISIS Combined]

[ED: The following article is republished from AL Witney.  It is a sobering thought that the number of US citizens harmed by its own government and agencies, including the CDC, is vastly more substantial than US citizens harmed by terrorist activity.  The US Government and its agencies are the greater threat to US citizens.

A recent article published in the British Medical Journal includes the following

Despite the agency’s disclaimer, the CDC does receive millions of dollars in industry gifts and funding, both directly and indirectly, and several recent CDC actions and recommendations have raised questions about the science it cites, the clinical guidelines it promotes, and the money it is taking.

Jeanne Lenzer, associate editor, The BMJ, USA Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: protecting the private good? BMJ 15 May 2015 Cite this as: BMJ 2015;350:h2362 ]


The Centers for Disease Control is a rogue institution engaged in the destruction of the health of the American population:-

  1. CDC is a for-profit corporation listed on Dun and Bradstreet
  2. CDC partners with big pharma
  3. CDC deceives health practitioners as well as the public
  4. CDC is rife with corruption
  5. CDC orchestrates propaganda campaigns based on non-existent threats
  6. CDC wastes billions of dollars and cannot demonstrate it is controlling disease
  7. CDC hires researchers to create bogus studies
  8. CDC does not protect the population, but promotes whatever agenda those who control the White House [the international banksters] wish advanced
  9. CDC pays public health institutions and even has employees stationed in their state offices
  10. CDC ignores congressional reports and/or hearings
  11. CDC actively discredits/destroys reputable researchers
  12. CDC bilks insurance companies out of billions of dollars by knowingly creating disease through their massive vaccination programs
  13. CDC hires private think-tank corporations to produce phoney ‘consensus’ science reports
  14. CDC promotes the dumping of toxic wastes from the chemical fertilizer industry into public drinking water in the name of ‘fluoridation’ contributing to ill health
  15. CDC has a long and nasty relationship with the CIA

While most physicians and public health workers may be unaware of the depth of the cover-up regarding vaccines, the harm they are causing is incalculable and the damage being inflicted on us and our children is devastating. Since the illnesses or injuries caused by toxic vaccines frequently don’t show up for weeks or even years, the medical industrial complex maintains plausible deniability.

Many good physicians have come forward (like those affiliated with the International Medical Council on Vaccination) and exposed the dangers of vaccines as have CDC whistle-blowers. The truth is everywhere. [See: CDC Exposed]

Question: Why would legislators trust any recommendation coming from the CDC?

Answer: They wouldn’t . . .  if they were told the truth.

Which organization in this movement is willing to get past the vaccination “choice” argument and help advance the truth i.e. the CDC and their so-called recommendations cannot be trusted AT ALL!

Here is a 40 minute interview with Dr David Lewis, former CDC/EPA employee and author of Science for Sale, blowing the whistle on the CDC, et al:

Dr David Lewis on In Defense of Humanity



AL Whitney
Retired Registered Respiratory Therapist Former Court Appointed Special Advocate for Children Spouse of a retired Family Practitioner

People for Safe Technologies

Save Children At Risk – Demand Release of Trial Data On Dangerous Vaccine – Help Yourself, Your Children and Others – Tell The Director, Christian Medical College, “Release Rotavirus Vaccine Trial Data”

Vaccines which kill and injure children are unacceptable.  This is why you are asked to sign the petition linked to below. The problem with the rotavirus vaccine is it can kill.  The other problem is the rotavirus is no risk to your child.

Read on for why. 

30 Seconds of your time could save a child’s life, so click the link and sign the petition:

To Director, Christian Medical College: Release Rotavirus Vaccine Trial Data

Rotavirus vaccine is given to children to interrupt the circulation of the rotavirus to prevent diahorrea.  In developed western economies this is not a killer disease.  The vaccine is part of a programme directed to eradication of the virus.  Your child gets the vaccine because some anonymous officials have decided they don’t want to develop a proper treatment.  They want to be heroes and claim the credit for eradicating a disease which is no threat to your child or any child in your entire country.  It does not seem to matter who gets in the way.  That your healthy child is put at risk of death on the way somehow does not seem important to some of them.  That larger numbers of third world economy children are put at risk also seems not so important – just as long as no one identifies and names those concerned as pushing a killer vaccine.

Rotavirus vaccine causes some children’s intestine to fold into or collapse into itself.  This is called intussusception.  It is dangerous and a killer.  It seems that many if not all rotavirus vaccines have this problem.  So if you are in a developed western country you have every right to insist 1) your child is not given a rotavirus vaccine and 2) those who push the vaccines develop effective treatments instead for the very few who might have a problem with the virus.

This killer vaccine is no benefit to your healthy baby, but is a threat even to your baby in the USA:  Intussusception Risk after Rotavirus Vaccination in U.S. Infants N Engl J Med 2014; 370:1766May 1, 2014DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc1402790.  This “telescoping” often blocks food or fluid from passing through. Intussusception also cuts off the blood supply to the part of the intestine that’s affected. Intussusception can lead to a tear in the bowel (perforation), infection and death of bowel tissue. It requires an x-ray and surgery to diagnose and correct the situation.

See the end of this post for a list of the top countries listed where rotavirus is of zero risk and for those where it is near negligible risk.

So you should be asking, why is my baby being given this vaccine?  And if you are in the USA, with the imminent introduction of the US “Vaccinate All Children Act of 2015” you have to ask why is the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices mandating a useless vaccine for my child which only puts my child at risk of death.  Under the Bill currently before Congress your child has to have vaccines ACIP mandates – no if’s, no but’s and no religious or conscientious exemptions and even if the vaccine is pointless and puts your child at risk including of death – like rotavirus vaccine [courtesy of Dr Paul Offit].

This brings us to the science and the main topic of this post.  Rotavirus Vaccine 116E has according to a letter in the journal Vaccine in 2015, been tested in only 4532 infants (4532 received vaccine; 2187 were controls). There was an excess of 11 cases of intussusception per 10,000 vaccinated. This is 5 to 10 times higher than the risk of intussusception with Rotashield vaccine (which was withdrawn from the market) and nearly 70 times higher than the risk of intussusception with the current, internationally licensed vaccine, RotaTeq.  Ultrasound evidence of intussusception was found in 17 who had received the 116E vaccine (3.75/1000 or 37.5/10,000) and in 6 babies receiving placebo (2.636/1000 or 26.36/10,000): Letter to Editor – Intussusception risk with 116E rotavirus vaccine in Vellore, South India. Drs Jalaj Bajaj & Jacob M. Puliyel Vaccine 2015

So please click the link and sign this petition:

To Director, Christian Medical College: Release Rotavirus Vaccine Trial Data

The WHO has said it is unethical not to disclose data from a trial of this nature. Instead of disclosing the data, there is concern it is planned to do an uncontrolled trial in 100,000 more children exposing them to risk of death without disclosing the data from the previous trial. The full data must be provided from the Vellore trial.

Intussusception rates varied in the different regions studied by John and colleagues. In Vellore it was 581/100,000 child-years and in Delhi it was much lower – 27.7/100,000 child-years. John J, et al Active surveillance for intussusception in a phase III efficacy trial of an oral mono-valent rotavirus vaccine in India. Vaccine 2014;32 (August (Suppl. 1)):A104–9.

The regional differences in intussusception rates could mean that it may be more risky to use the vaccine in some areas. The authors called for segregated data from Vellore for vaccinated and control where the intussusceptions cases were highest. This data could also point out if a certain section of the population were more susceptible to adverse effects. However despite several attempts the data is not being shared which is a cause for great concern.

We would request the Director, Christian Medical College to release the trial data as per the recent WHO call for ethics and transparency in research.

Don’t be pushed around by some of the thugs and bullies who accuse people concerned for children’s safety that they are “anti-vaccine” instead of pro children’s safety.  They are encouraged by Dr Ben Goldacre’s BadScience Forum or some thugs and bullies amongst those individuals who congregate at Dr David Gorski’s rants on the non-science or near science-free “scienceblogs” blog or by the likes of Dr Paul Offit, who attacks anyone whilst making money from his own rotavirus patents: Paul Offit – Liar “Doctor of Vaccine Profit” Voted His Patented Rotavirus Vaccine For US Children When On Vaccine Safety Committee.


A word of warning about the statistics.  These are World Health Organisation estimates.  In CHS’s opinion WHO is not a reliable source of data and their estimates can be what we believe is exaggerated.  Do not forget that it was the WHO’s SAGE Committee headed by the UK’s Professor David Salisbury which brought us the swine flu debacle and at least 800 children who developed the serious condition of narcolepsy from GSK’s in our view near pointless for children swine flu vaccine.  Some of the people who push vaccines appear in our opinion to be fanatics who do not listen to science, ethics or reason.

ISO3 Country 2008 rotavirus deaths, aged < 5 95%
confidence interval
 < 5 rota mortality rate (per 100 000 population < 5)
AND Andorra <10 0 -10 0 0.1
ARE United Arab Emirates <10 0 -10 0 0.3
AUS Australia <10 0 -10 0 0.2
AUT Austria <10 0 -10 0 0.2
BEL Belgium <10 0 -10 0 0.5
BHS Bahamas <10 0 -10 0 0.1
BLR Belarus <10 0 -10 0 0.1
BRB Barbados <10 0 -10 0 0.0
BRN Brunei Darussalam <10 0 -10 0 0.2
CAN Canada <10 0 -10 0 0.0
CHE Switzerland <10 0 -10 0 0.0
CHL Chile <10 0 -10 0 0.1
COK Cook Islands <10 0 -10 0 0.0
CYP Cyprus <10 0 -10 0 0.1
CZE Czech Republic <10 0 -10 0 0.3
DEU Germany <10 0 -10 0 0.1
DMA Dominica <10 0 -10 0 0.0
DNK Denmark <10 0 -10 0 0.4
ESP Spain <10 0 -10 0 0.1
EST Estonia <10 0 -10 0 0.0
FIN Finland <10 0 -10 0 0.2
FRA France 18 12 – 23 0 0.5
GBR United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland <10 0 -10 0 0.0
GRC Greece <10 0 -10 0 0.0
GRD Grenada <10 0 -10 0 0.0
HUN Hungary <10 0 -10 0 0.1
IRL Ireland <10 0 -10 0 0.0
ISL Iceland <10 0 -10 0 0.0
ISR Israel <10 0 -10 0 0.0
ITA Italy <10 0 -10 0 0.0
JPN Japan 20 14 – 26 0 0.5
KNA Saint Kitts and Nevis <10 0 -10 0 0.0
KOR Republic of Korea <10 0 -10 0 0.1
KWT Kuwait <10 0 -10 0 0.2
LUX Luxembourg <10 0 -10 0 0.0
LVA Latvia <10 0 -10 0 0.0
MCO Monaco <10 0 -10 0 0.1
MLT Malta <10 0 -10 0 0.0
MNE Montenegro <10 0 -10 0 0.0
NLD Netherlands <10 0 -10 0 0.2
NOR Norway <10 0 -10 0 0.5
NZL New Zealand <10 0 -10 0 0.2
POL Poland <10 0 -10 0 0.0
PRT Portugal <10 0 -10 0 0.0
SGP Singapore <10 0 -10 0 0.0
SMR San Marino <10 0 -10 0 0.0
SRB Serbia <10 0 -10 0 0.0
SVK Slovakia <10 0 -10 0 0.1
SVN Slovenia <10 0 -10 0 0.0
SWE Sweden <10 0 -10 0 0.3
SYC Seychelles <10 0 -10 0 0.0
USA United States of America 14 10 – 19 0 0.0
VCT Saint Vincent and the Grenadines <10 0 -10 0 0.0
ARG Argentina 45 41 – 49 1 0.4
BGR Bulgaria <10 0 -10 1 0.3
BHR Bahrain <10 0 -10 1 0.3
BIH Bosnia and Herzegovina <10 0 -10 1 0.5
CRI Costa Rica <10 0 -10 1 0.3
CUB Cuba <10 0 -10 1 0.7
HRV Croatia <10 0 -10 1 0.6
LCA Saint Lucia <10 0 -10 1 0.2
LTU Lithuania <10 0 -10 1 0.3
MUS Mauritius <10 0 -10 1 0.4
MYS Malaysia 15 14 – 16 1 0.4
NIU Niue <10 0 -10 1 0.3
QAT Qatar <10 0 -10 1 0.6
ROU Romania 14 13 – 16 1 0.4
RUS Russian Federation 90 82 – 99 1 0.4
UKR Ukraine 16 14 – 17 1 0.2
ATG Antigua and Barbuda <10 0 -10 2 0.9
TTO Trinidad and Tobago <10 0 -10 2 0.4
URY Uruguay <10 0 -10 2 0.9
ALB Albania <10 0 -10 3 0.7
ARM Armenia <10 0 -10 3 0.7
LBN Lebanon <10 0 -10 3 0.5
MDA Republic of Moldova <10 0 -10 3 0.6
MKD The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia <10 0 -10 3 1.1
OMN Oman <10 0 -10 3 1.1
THA Thailand 153 139 – 168 3 1.2
TUR Turkey 188 171 – 206 3 0.7
TUV Tuvalu <10 0 -10 3 0.4
LKA Sri Lanka 72 65 – 78 4 1.0
MEX Mexico 464 422 – 507 4 1.1
BRA Brazil 857 780 – 937 5 1.3
CHN China 4161 3,783 – 4,548 5 1.2
LBY Libyan Arab Jamahiriya 38 35 – 42 5 1.4
PLW Palau <10 0 -10 5 1.1
COL Colombia 282 256 – 308 6 1.5
KAZ Kazakhstan 92 84 – 101 6 0.7
SLV El Salvador 34 31 – 38 6 1.4
FJI Fiji <10 0 -10 7 1.9
SYR Syrian Arab Republic 173 158 – 190 7 2.1
VNM Viet Nam 524 476 – 572 7 1.3
VUT Vanuatu <10 0 -10 7 2.1
BLZ Belize <10 0 -10 8 2.2
SAU Saudi Arabia 241 219 – 263 8 2.1
SUR Suriname <10 0 -10 8 1.3
TUN Tunisia 68 62 – 75 8 2.1
EGY Egypt 819 697 – 945 9 1.8
MDV Maldives <10 0 -10 9 2.4
PER Peru 277 244 – 311 9 2.1
SLB Solomon Islands <10 0 -10 9 1.6
TON Tonga <10 0 -10 9 2.8
VEN Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 251 228 – 275 9 2.2
JOR Jordan 75 68 – 82 10 2.0
MNG Mongolia 26 24 – 29 10 1.2
ECU Ecuador 162 143 – 182 11 2.4
PAN Panama 38 34 – 41 11 2.5
WSM Samoa <10 0 -10 12 3.0
FSM Micronesia (Federated States of) <10 0 -10 13 1.5
GEO Georgia 35 32 – 38 14 2.6
PHL Philippines 1564 1,422 – 1,710 14 2.2
NRU Nauru <10 0 -10 15 1.8
PRY Paraguay 121 110 – 132 16 3.1
GUY Guyana 17 15 – 18 22 3.9
NIC Nicaragua 147 130 – 165 22 3.5
NAM Namibia 66 56 – 76 23 2.4
CPV Cape Verde 13 11 – 15 24 3.1
DOM Dominican Republic 274 249 – 300 26 4.4
HND Honduras 257 234 – 281 27 5.0
MHL Marshall Islands <10 0 -10 28 5.0
BWA Botswana 67 57 – 78 30 2.8
PNG Papua New Guinea 277 252 – 303 30 2.2
PRK Democratic People’s Republic of Korea 517 440 – 595 30 4.4
JAM Jamaica 78 71 – 85 32 6.1
IRN Iran (Islamic Republic of) 1974 1,795 – 2,158 33 5.3
DZA Algeria 1173 998 – 1,354 34 4.2
LAO Lao People’s Democratic Republic 281 256 – 307 40 3.2
UZB Uzbekistan 1091 992 – 1,193 41 3.4
AZE Azerbaijan 329 299 – 360 44 3.6
MAR Morocco 1316 1,121 – 1,520 44 5.4
IDN Indonesia 9970 9,066 – 10,899 45 5.8
IRQ Iraq 2257 1,921 – 2,598 46 5.4
KGZ Kyrgyzstan 259 236 – 283 48 5.1
GAB Gabon 95 81 – 109 52 3.2
LSO Lesotho 143 122 – 165 52 2.5
ZWE Zimbabwe 903 769 – 1,043 54 2.9
TKM Turkmenistan 284 259 – 311 55 4.4
ZAF South Africa 2882 2,454 – 3,328 56 4.1
KIR Kiribati <10 0 -10 60 5.8
GHA Ghana 2090 1,780 – 2,413 61 3.6
KHM Cambodia 921 837 – 1,007 61 4.8
TLS Timor-Leste 114 97 – 131 63 4.5
BGD Bangladesh 9857 8,392 – 11,347 65 6.0
GTM Guatemala 1502 1,323 – 1,684 71 9.8
NPL Nepal 2601 2,214 – 2,994 72 6.6
SWZ Swaziland 112 95 – 129 72 3.9
BOL Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 946 833 – 1,061 76 6.2
IND India 98621 83,958 – 113,521 77 5.5
STP Sao Tome and Principe 18 16 – 21 78 4.6
MDG Madagascar 2787 2,374 – 3,218 88 6.0
ERI Eritrea 730 621 – 842 89 6.1
SEN Senegal 1951 1,661 – 2,252 98 5.4
BTN Bhutan 72 61 – 83 99 7.7
TJK Tajikistan 865 787 – 946 101 7.0
MWI Malawi 2558 2,178 – 2,954 102 4.3
GMB Gambia 290 247 – 335 104 4.6
COM Comoros 126 107 – 145 107 5.4
TZA United Republic of Tanzania 8171 6,958 – 9,434 108 5.8
CIV Côte d’Ivoire 3393 2,889 – 3,917 116 4.1
MOZ Mozambique 4481 3,815 – 5,173 116 3.6
MMR Myanmar 4717 4,016 – 5,430 119 8.1
COG Congo 723 616 – 835 121 5.8
BEN Benin 1757 1,496 – 2,029 122 4.5
LBR Liberia 771 656 – 890 122 4.8
TGO Togo 1050 894 – 1,212 123 5.3
KEN Kenya 8005 6,817 – 9,243 125 6.4
DJI Djibouti 142 121 – 165 128 6.2
GNQ Equatorial Guinea 131 112 – 152 129 4.5
YEM Yemen 5094 4,337 – 5,864 132 7.4
SDN Sudan 8450 7,195 – 9,756 135 5.9
GIN Guinea 2328 1,982 – 2,687 145 4.6
MRT Mauritania 780 664 – 900 156 6.3
ZMB Zambia 3617 3,080 – 4,176 160 5.9
NGA Nigeria 41057 34,960 – 47,402 161 4.7
UGA Uganda 10637 9,058 – 12,281 173 7.3
CAF Central African Republic 1162 989 – 1,341 181 4.9
HTI Haiti 2234 1,968 – 2,505 182 10.3
PAK Pakistan 39144 33,324 – 45,058 191 9.5
CMR Cameroon 5825 4,960 – 6,725 196 6.2
RWA Rwanda 3472 2,957 – 4,009 206 8.8
SLE Sierra Leone 2058 1,752 – 2,376 218 5.0
BFA Burkina Faso 6228 5,303 – 7,191 222 5.3
ETH Ethiopia 28218 24,028 – 32,579 235 9.8
NER Niger 7473 6,363 – 8,627 258 7.3
MLI Mali 7253 6,176 – 8,374 262 6.1
AGO Angola 8788 7,483 – 10,147 263 6.9
GNB Guinea-Bissau 641 545 – 740 273 7.7
COD Democratic Republic of the Congo 32653 27,804 – 37,699 283 7.0
BDI Burundi 3561 3,032 – 4,111 314 9.5
SOM Somalia 5110 4,351 – 5,899 317 7.6
TCD Chad 6347 5,405 – 7,328 327 8.0
AFG Afghanistan 25423 21,643 – 29,263 474 13.8


First They Came for the Anti-Vaxxers – By Bretigne Shaffer –

This is a must-read in-depth article with good citations you may want to note which looks well-researched.  It is also from an influential right-of-centre US website with regular contributions by some leading individuals in the USA: ANTI-STATEANTI-WARPRO-MARKET

First They Came for the Anti-Vaxxers

By – April 23, 2015

Earlier this year I spent a few days at the Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center with my daughter who was having an EEG done. On our way home, I learned that there had been an outbreak of an antibiotic-resistant bacteria while we were there, that it had infected seven people and killed two of them. My daughter and I were fine – the infection having been limited to people using a particular kind of duodenoscope.

When the story hit the news, I fully expected nationwide outcry similar to that inspired by the recent measles “epidemic” that began at Disneyland. That outbreak killed no-one, yet set the country on fire with calls for mandatory vaccination and even prison sentences for parents who choose not to vaccinate their children. Drug-resistant “superbugs” kill nearly 15,000 people a year in the US and a recent report predicts that they could kill as many as 300 million people by 2050. Surely this far more deadly health threat would lead to similar widespread outrage and calls for those even remotely responsible to be held accountable.

I expected to see editorials calling for anyone who engaged in the overuse of antibiotics to be shunned by society; doctors who prescribed them unnecessarily (around 50% of all prescriptions by some estimates) to be censured and perhaps lose their licenses; parents who asked for antibiotics every time their child had an ear infection – despite the fact that the vast majority are not bacterial and are unaffected by antibiotics – to be thrown in jail for endangering the rest of us. But I saw nothing along these lines. Why not?

The manipulation of the conversation around vaccines in the mainstream media has been nothing short of a tour de force. If you read only mainstream publications, you might come away with the impression that outbreaks of measles are the most serious public health crisis since the Black Death. You might think that those who do not vaccinate are uneducated, superstitious, “anti-science” zealots who get their information from daytime talk shows. You might even start to feel outrage at these people who – for no good reason at all – have decided to endanger everyone else by refusing to do what every doctor knows is perfectly safe, effective and the socially responsible thing to do.

The presentation of this issue has been a study in just how easy it can be to generate mass hysteria around a particular threat – even while much more serious threats inspire no such response. It’s as if every mainstream reporter has been given the same playbook to use in putting together their articles about vaccines – a playbook designed to elicit the above response from the public. I’ve tried to imagine what this playbook must look like and I think I’ve come up with a pretty decent facsimile. Here it is, along with my own annotations:

Read here for more: First They Came for the Anti-Vaxxers

Andrew Wakefield Phone In Tomorrow Sunday – Blog Talk Radio – 15th February


What have vaccines done to your kids. Have CPS social services taken your children after vaccine damages ? PRO AND ANTI VACCINE’S PLEASE TUNE IN.

CALL USA 3476770812
CALL UK 01444 390270



Officials Covered Up “Massive” UK Measles Outbreak in Highly MMR Vaccinated Children & Adults – Officials Withheld The Evidence – Parents Not Warned – Children Unprotected – BBC Directly Implicated

In 2012 and 2013 outbreaks of measles occurred in large numbers of children and adults in areas of highly vaccinated populations in the North of England.   The North of England outbreaks involved the same MMR vaccine in use in the USA, Merck’s MMR II. 

Instead of warning parents in the North that their children were at risk and taking precautionary measures, nothing was said.  The British public were not told the MMR vaccine was failing to protect children from measles. 

A classic diversionary misinformation tactic was employed by British health officials to cover up this major failure of the MMR vaccine to protect children from an age old childhood disease.

CHS brings its readers full details of the official figures with extracts of the official documents in which they appeared.

As CHS previously reported, a journal paper published in 2012 reported that Merck’s MMR II vaccine was not working and a new vaccine was called for by the author: Mayo Clinic Expert Confirms Measles Vaccine Is Failing – So it’s NOT the unvaccinated.

In January and February 2013 there were 265 laboratory confirmed cases of measles in the North of England reported on Page 4 Health Protection Briefing Note 2013-19 Measles outbreak in England Jan+Feb 2013 authorised to be published by Dr Mary Ramsey of Public Health England Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance and Control (CIDSC). These were over half the confirmed cases in the whole of England in 2013 up to that time [450 laboratory confirmed cases]. 

The rate of overreporting of measles cases meant only 1 in 4 reported cases were measles, so 450 cases translates to approximately 1800 reported cases with over 900 of those notifications being in the North of England:

[Click on Table to enlarge and view in a new window]

Table confirmed cases from Health Protection Briefing Note 2013-19 Measles outbreak in England Jan+Feb 2013

It was predictable that the North of England measles outbreaks in these highly vaccinated populations could cause outbreaks elsewhere in the UK. And it seems they did.

In comparison to the already far higher numbers in the North of England which had started at the beginning of November 2013, the position in Wales was comparatively insignificant.  By 7th February 2013 there had been approximately 40 laboratory confirmed cases in Wales. The October 2013 final report into the Welsh outbreaks confirmed there had been 168 measles notifications compared by that time to the 1800 notifications in England and exceeding 900 in the North of England.

UK government health officials in early 2013, lead by Dr Mary Ramsey of Health Protection England, deliberately focussed attention on smaller outbreaks in South Wales and the public were not warned about the scale of measles outbreaks in the North of England.  The media were generally not kept informed about what was happening in the North.  It was made to look like the whole of the UK was put at risk by the vaccination dissenters in Wales.  The truth and the official statistics indicate the reverse.  The failure of the MMR vaccine was putting the country at risk of measles outbreaks.  Wales was used to divert attention.

Outbreaks in the UK were in effect being blamed on the many dissenting parents in Wales who were justifiably undecided about vaccination for their children in view of the serious risks vaccination poses to far too many children and the relatively low risk in comparison that measles in reality poses.  Every week over months all the news in the UK about measles was about Wales and the parents who had not vaccinated their children. There were weekly media briefings and press releases over months.  Little to nothing was said about the position in the North. 

Dr Mary Ramsey and others used the opportunity to create a scare by focussing on Wales and not publicising the scale of the pre-existing outbreaks in the heavily MMR vaccinated North of England which predated those in Wales and which it seems may have caused them.  This appears to have been a cynical attempt to increase the vaccination statistics in areas of lower vaccination uptake. 

As the expectant and then shortly after appointed Head of Immunisation, Public Health England, Dr Ramsey would be judged on her performance in getting children vaccinated.  So this gives the impression, perhaps unfairly and perhaps not, that the entire affair of measles vaccinations in England and how the outbreaks were publicised [and not publicised] were influenced by the internal political interests in Public Health England.  The priority was clearly to vaccinate.  Warning parents their vaccinated children were at risk from a failing MMR vaccine was not.

And its was done despite officials knowing Merck’s MMR II vaccine was not working as it was claimed publicly that it did.

By the end of August 2013 there had been 757 confirmed cases in the North as published in Health Protection Report Vol 7 No. 40 – 4 October 2013:

[Click on Table to enlarge and view in a new window]

Table Confirmed Cases from 2013 England confirmed - to End Aug hpr4013These figures did not include any cases from September to December 2012. In comparison, in Wales there had been in total of 432 cases confirmed with onset dates between 1 November 2012 and 16 June 2013, as reported in the October 2013 final report into the Welsh outbreaks.  The North of England had over twice the number of confirmed cases in a shorter period.

And putting all of this into context, the numbers in Wales and in the North of England were extremely low compared to the tens of thousands of cases in the 1960s and earlier which health officials even today use to claim 1 in 1000 children will die from measles when that is knowingly a serious untruth.  In the 1960s British doctors did not panic over a few cases of measles as CHS reported here with quotes from the British Medical Journal in 1959: British Medical Journal Tells Us – Measles Is Not The Scary Disease The Press Want You To Think It Is.

The role of the BBC, the UK’s public service broadcaster, paid for by a direct tax, a licence fee levy on all households having a television, shows that it acts as a mouthpiece for the establishment and fails to carry out the task of responsible journalism and news reporting.  When the Welsh outbreaks were dying out, a presentation was prepared on 24 April 2013 by Dr Mary Ramsey, Head of Immunisation, Public Health England and presented to the media

Following Dr Ramsey’s presentation, and using most of its charts and graphics, the BBC published a news story on

Measles outbreak in maps and graphics

How had Dr Ramsey briefed the BBC to describe the position in the highly vaccinated North?  This is what and how the BBC reported:

The cases at the opposite end of England have been put down to bad luck, despite the relatively high levels of vaccination there.”

It is a scandal of the 21st Century that there is still no effective treatment for children who contract measles.  The most powerful nation in the world cannot protect its children against a simple centuries old disease which is steadily dying out and that there is no effective treatment for measles.  What is the US NIH spending its US$40 billion tax dollar budget on each year and why is it not spent on a simple effective treatment for measles. 

Despite vaccination millions of children still die in third world economies from basic childhood diseases.  If instead there were an effective treatment for diseases like measles those lives could be saved. 

The President of the United States is the President of a country which has to watch from the sidelines as nuclear powers like India lead the world into space. He remains unable to protect US children from basic childhood diseases when the US has the ability to develop effective treatments to save lives.

It is also a scandal that the President of the United States has recently effectively demanded and bullied parents into vaccinating their children risking serious conditions like 1 in 60 developing autism as a result of vaccination and threatening them with all-out compulsory vaccination even for those children for whom vaccination poses a clear and present danger of serious consequences and even death.

As for the measles vaccine, for a supposedly well-established vaccine there are quite a large number of current measles vaccine trials:

1 Recruiting Immunogenicity and Safety of GSK Biologicals’ Combined Measles-mumps-rubella Vaccine in Volunteers, Seven Years of Age and Older

Conditions: Rubella;   Mumps;   Measles
Interventions: Biological: Priorix®;   Biological: Merck’s M-M-R®II, Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Virus Vaccine
2 Recruiting Immunogenicity and Safety Study of GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Biologicals’ Combined Measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) Vaccine in Subjects Four to Six Years of Age

Conditions: Rubella;   Mumps;   Measles
Interventions: Biological: Priorix®;   Biological: Merck’s M-M-R®II, Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Virus Vaccine (also known as M-M-R Vax Pro™);   Biological: Kinrix®;   Biological: Varivax®
3 Recruiting Safety and Immunogenicity Study of GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Biologicals’ Measles, Mumps and Rubella (MMR) Vaccine (209762) Compared to Merck & Co., Inc.’s MMR Vaccine in Healthy Children 12 to 15 Months of Age

Condition: Measles; Mumps; Rubella
Interventions: Biological: GSK Biologicals measles, mumps and rubella vaccine live (GSK 209762);   Biological: Merck & Co., Inc.’s M-M-R®II (also called M-M-R Vax Pro®), combined measles-mumps-rubella virus vaccine;   Biological: Varivax® (Merck & Co., Inc.);   Biological: Havrix®;   Biological: Prevnar 13® (Pfizer Inc.)
4 Not yet recruiting Study of Immunogenicity, Reactogenicity and Safety of the Combined Measles, Mumps and Rubella Vaccine Produced by Bio-Manguinhos/Fiocruz in Children 12-15 Months of Age, Followed by Tetraviral Vaccine in Children 15-18 Months.

Conditions: Measles;   Mumps;   Rubella;   Varicella
Interventions: Biological: MMR  Bio-Manguinhos;   Biological: MMR GlaxoSmithKline

6 Recruiting

Safety & Immunogenicity of MMR Vaccine by DSJI to That by Needle-Syringe in 15-18 Months Old Children

Condition: Immune Response to MMR Vaccine
Intervention: Biological: MMR vaccine

Vaccines Proven To Cause Sudden Death in Children – 67 Deaths Only Explicable As Caused By Vaccines – Drug Safety Regulators Had The Information for Over 2 Years And Let Children Die

This confirmation vaccines cause children to die suddenly was published this month on the US National Library of Medicine’s website.

For decades regulators and public health officials have insisted parents were wrong to blame vaccines when their children died suddenly shortly after vaccination.  It was coincidence they would say – nothing more. 

The deaths were no more than the number usually to be expected they would add.

But all the time drug safety regulators appear to have been holding the evidence.

A confidential 1271 page GSK document ordered recently by an Italian Court to be published shows that multiple vaccines cause sudden child deaths.  [The document is a formal confidential previously unpublished submission by GlaxoSmithKline to the European Medicines Agency from 2011 and 2012.]

The GSK document contains data about deaths occurring as a result of administration of Prevenar 13 vaccine [from Pfizer], Infanrix Hexa from GSK and some other vaccines.  Prevenar 13 is given to all British children.

The analysis has been published on the US National Library of Medicines website using the data GSK provided to the European Medicines Agency.  The data is conclusive.  It is very clear and there is no room for argument.

And the analysis is simple.  Anyone can understand it.  The very plain data the document contains proves the matter without any doubt whatsoever.

Here is the one of the points from the published analysis [but there is more to read online].  It is not rocket science but very simple to understand:

(Source: Table 36 The GlaxoSmithKline Biological Clinical Safety and Pharmacovigilance report to Regulatory Authority)…… if one analyses the data looking at deaths in first 10 days after administration of vaccine and compares it to the deaths in the next 10 days, it is clear that 97% of deaths (65 deaths) in the infants below 1 year, occur in the first 10 days and 3% (2 deaths) occur in the next 10 days. Had the deaths been coincidental SIDS deaths unrelated to vaccination, the numbers of deaths in the two 10 day periods should have been the same. Similarly in children older than 1 year, 87.5% deaths (7 deaths) occurred in the first 10 days and 12.5% (1 death) occurred in the next 10 days.

Here is the data presented in a way that the clustering of deaths can be seen clearly [click on the table to open a larger version in a new window]:
20150210 GSK PSUR 15+16 Infanrix Hexa Deaths

The clustering of deaths around the time of vaccination demonstrates a link between the vaccination and the sudden deaths. It indicates this is not by chance as otherwise the deaths would be spread across the entire 20 days. Rather than showing the total deaths each day, GlaxoSmithKline showed the cumulative figures which had the effect of disguising the clustering of deaths around vaccination. They did this by listing the cumulative number of deaths. So by day 19 after vaccination GSK’s total was 67 deaths. But there had only been two deaths in those last 10 days and not 67. In contrast 65 deaths occurred on the first day of vaccination up to the 10th day following vaccination.

And here you can see GSK’s Table 36.  The way it is prepared disguises the clustering of deaths around the time of vaccination – the total cumulative number of deaths up to 10 days from vaccination is 65.  That number over the next 10 days increases by only 2.  So in 10 days there were 65 deaths and between day 11 to day 20 after vaccination there were only another two deaths.  So only the vaccine can be the cause of this:

TABLE 36  20111216 GSK Infanrix Hexa Summary Bridging Report 16-12-2011

The worst aspect is that the Observed to Expected ratio of deaths reported compared to deaths expected if the vaccine was not the cause was based on numbers of doses.  As each child was meant to receive three doses and not one, the Expected number of deaths was based on a population three times greater than it was, calculated by how many doses of the vaccines were distributed as if each child received only one dose.

Further, the day of vaccination and the prior day is when the Healthy Vaccinee Effect is greatest.  In short on those days the chance of a vaccinated child having some other illness including one which might result in a sudden death is very low – and can be expected to be less than a 0.1 chance relatively.  This arises because parents tend to avoid having their child vaccinated when unwell.  Over the day of vaccination and succeeding six days  the chance of illness rises practically linearly to return to chance of 1 relatively.  The Expected calculation for the seven days starting on the day of vaccination relied on a correction of 0.8 which is several times higher than appropriate for the first few days following vaccination.  And no adjustment was made for under reporting of adverse events.

All of these factors resulted in the ratio of Observed deaths to those Expected calculated by GSK was much more than three times lower than it should have been. So for the day of vaccination with 16 observed deaths, substantially fewer than that would be expected.

This is how GSK presented their formula:

GSK OE Formula cropped

Here is a serious issue.  This kind of information is routinely provided to regulators like the MHRA but never made public.  On the one occasion such a document is published as a result of the actions of a judge in an Italian Court it is possible to show beyond any doubt that multiple vaccines cause sudden deaths in children.

This appears a serious failing of European regulators.

All the EU regulators including the MHRA have had this information for at least three years and failed to act on it.

Further, the MHRA has an agreement with the drug industry not to publish information like this despite the provisions of the UK Freedom of Information Act.

And here is an example of how slanted news reporting is.  The following report is not an independent objective balanced report of the facts:

Dawn Papple, Independent Outsourced Freelance Writer, Social Media Marketer, Independent Contractor

It is by someone called Dawn Papple apparently from the Greater Detroit Area USA who lists her working activities as Independent Outsourced Freelance Writer, Freelance Writer, Social Media Marketer, Graphic Designer, Independent Contractor.

This appears to be a somewhat racist press report, referring to the information being just from India and “the doctor from Delhi” [as if we can all ignore it] and claims the issue is being raised by “anti-vaccine” proponents.  It does not address properly the safety of children nor does it contain any proper overview of the real risks of disease for  children against the risks of vaccines nor why there are real causes for concern.

There is clearly an intentional bias.  Criticising the original edition of this CHS article, prior to this revision to review Papple’s report, Papple states:

The doctor who analyzed the data did not state that there was no room for argument, though. He did not brazenly state that the hexavalent Infanrix vaccine causes sudden death in babies.

It may not have been “brazen” as Papple writes emotionally, but it does look like he did and Papple knows that.  She wrote earlier in the article that the doctor stated:

this demonstrates a link between the vaccination event and the sudden deaths.”

Dawn Papple does not question whether the information GSK provided is reliable and downplays the way GSK disguised the clustering of deaths around the time of vaccination stating, as if it were the wrong approach [emphasis added]:

Rather than compounding the total deaths each day, as in the documents found online, the pediatrics doctor suggests we examine how many more deaths happened right after the vaccine was given compared to as the days went by. He said this demonstrates a link between the vaccination event and the sudden deaths.

A substantial omission from Dawn Papple’s article is she does not discuss that GSK has been caught, found guilty of and fined substantial sums of money for serious misconduct including paying up with the largest health fraud settlement in US history.  But Dawn Papple takes as true what GSK says compared to a doctor who with courage has reported publicly this problem with vaccine caused sudden deaths which GSK kept secret and reported in a disguised manner to the safety regulators. 

CHS has reported on GSK’s problems with fraud and the like before.  Here is an example:

GSK Fined US$3 BILLION – largest health fraud settlement in U.S. history

Remarkably, Papple claims this CHS article is by “an anti-vaccine advocate from Child Health Safety“.  She has no information to support such a spurious claim and when CHS is pro-safety, democracy and informed and free choice.  Papple it would seem is against.

Absent from the report is the issue that parents are told vaccines are entirely safe when they are not. Also absent from the report is the fact that vaccines are given to children the majority of whom especially in the western world are highly unlikely to suffer serious adverse effects of disease.

In other words normal healthy children are being given vaccines which can kill some of them who may never have a problem from the childhood diseases concerned, even if they caught them. 

The report also fails to address the fact that no effective treatments for basic well-known longstanding childhood diseases have been developed.  That is a scandal in the scientific 21st Century.  If there were effective treatments vaccines would not be needed.

So not only will the public will not get balanced information, here you can see attacks against the dissemination of information via social media.

With mainstream media reporting about vaccination issues being successfully made a near blackout except for reports promoting vaccines, this article shows how the next targets are likely to be shutting down social media and the internet for people to get information about vaccine issues.

Here from the report is a dubious claim which contradicts and downplays under-reporting of adverse vaccine reactions:

According to the statistics within the document, even if the doctor from Delhi’s fears are spot on, the risk of sudden death, while existent, would also be exceptionally rare after vaccination with the hexavalent Infanrix vaccine.”

Earlier in the report it refers to adverse vaccine reactions being under-reported but fails to explain how substantially under-reported they are.  So the information in the GSK document represents a small fraction of the problems of adverse vaccine reactions.

And interestingly, this article, seemingly reviewing the GSK document and many other publications also has been written in a very short space of time when the material concerned is extensive and would require a very long time to consider it.  It also contains no quotes from sources approached by the author, Dawn Papple, to support what she has written including the statements she makes as if of fact and the opinions she expresses [with no medical or scientific qualifications]. That is very poor journalism in our view.

The GSK document is 1271 pages alone.  Journalists normally do not have that kind of time.  This article is written by someone who describes her work as Independent Outsourced Freelance Writer, Freelance Writer, Social Media Marketer, Graphic Designer, Independent Contractor.

If you were to form the opinion that her publication is trash journalism, you might be right and we would agree.

WARNING TO PARENTS – Protect Your Child From Another Clearly Dangerous Vaccine – HPV [Gardasil & Cervarix] – And The Common Corruption in Government Public Health Agencies

Here you can see at a glance why this vaccine should be withdrawn worldwide and ask yourself why do health officials promote such dangerous, ineffective, unaffordable and unnecessary vaccine programmes.  CHS has previously reported on this vaccine:

SaneVax is an international non-profit organization working with representatives in over 25 countries. SaneVax believes vaccines should be scientifically proven safe, affordable, necessary and effective.  The SaneVax Team say they cannot support HPV vaccination programs for the following reasons:


  • HPV vaccines account for nearly 25% of the reports on the USA’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database. VAERS was established in 1990. HPV vaccines were introduced 16 years later in mid-2006.  And there are over 80 other vaccines approved for use in the United States.  Since the introduction of HPV vaccines [including Gardasil and Cervarix]:

    • reports of Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis [ADEM] have increased over 1,000%;
    • infertility reports increased 790%;
    • reports of blindness increased 188%;
    • spontaneous abortions by 270%.
  • when 24,000 girls were injected with HPV vaccines during ‘demonstration projects’ an estimated 5% (1200) were left with chronic health problems and/or autoimmune disorders;
  • Japan withdrew the government recommendation for the administration of HPV vaccines after only 6 weeks when reports of adverse events after Gardasil were 26 times higher than the annual flu shot;
    • reports after Cervarix were 52 times higher than the annual flu shot;
    • 24.9% of the adverse events reported were considered serious.
  • Denmark reports that 24% of the adverse events reported after HPV vaccinations were considered serious.
  • adverse events reports in Italy are ten times higher than most other vaccines – at a rate of 219/100,000. The cervical cancer rate in Italy is 7.7/100,000.


  • HPV vaccination programs do not eliminate the need for pap screening, they simply add the price of 3 injections to already overburdened healthcare systems around the globe.
  • There is an already proven safe and effective method of controlling cervical cancer in most developed countries – pap screening and good gynecological follow-up. Countries without this practice in place would be money ahead to spend their healthcare budget developing the infrastructure to provide this type of care.
  • Cervical cancer causes 2.3 deaths/100,000 women in the United States. The cost of 3 doses of HPV vaccine for 100,000 women is an estimated $30,000,000 ($100/dose) to try and eliminate less than 3 deaths which could have been avoided with pap screening and good gynecological follow-up. How many medical professionals could be trained and/or medical facilities built with that same 30 million dollars?


  • The human papillomavirus has never been proven to cause cancer by itself. Other risk factors must also be present in order to prompt the development of cancer.
  • According to the World Health Organization, only 0.15% of all people exposed to any high-risk strain of HPV will ever develop cervical cancer. The vast majority of HPV ‘infections’ are benign and cause no medical problem whatsoever.
  • HPV type prevalence varies greatly from one region to the next. Are the HPV types targeted by current vaccines the same ones prevalent in your country?
  • There is no excuse for exposing the female population of the world to the risks involved with HPV vaccination when there is an already proven safe, affordable, necessary and effective means of controlling cervical cancer.


  • According to the World Health Organization, only 1% of CIN1 progresses to the next stage, only 1.5% of CIN2 progresses. Only 12% of CIN3 lesions, which are actually considered a pre-cursors to cancer. Nevertheless, the FDA allowed the manufacturers of HPV vaccines to use these often self-reversing abnormal lesions as endpoints to judge the efficacy of their products.
  • The other endpoint used to predict efficacy was antibody titers. No one has determined what level of antibodies is necessary to prevent HPV infections. It is simply assumed that the higher the antibody titer level, the better the potential protection.
  • HPV vaccines have not been clinically proven to prevent a single case of cancer.
  • There is no guarantee that eliminating one risk factor for the development of cervical cancer will have any impact on the disease incidence or mortality rate.
  • It will take more than 20 years to determine whether or not HPV vaccines perform as advertised.
  • There is no guarantee that any suppressed oncogenic HPV type will not mutate over the next 20 years and become more dangerous.

More US CDC Research Fraud – Publishing False Figures to Promote A Pointless Vaccine to The US and Third World

The video below shows with references to peer reviewed citations in journal papers that the US Centers for Disease Control medical scientists engage in using peer reviewed journal publications, in this case Health Economics, to promote Hep B vaccine on false and made up figures.  Hepatitis B vaccine is given to every US baby immediately following birth when the disease risk is predominantly to intravenous drug abusers and practitioners of unsafe sex and not babies.  Hepatitis B vaccine has a reputation as a particularly toxic vaccine: UK Government Caught Lying On Baby Hep B Vax Safety.

This 7 minute video contains citations to peer reviewed journal publications showing the CDC falsifying disease data to promote the Hep B vaccine by claiming 250,000 hepatitis cancer deaths in India and published this in a journal paper. The paper claims a death rate at 5000% of the true figure such that the vaccine is being promoted on a completely false basis which cannot be justified on the basis of the true figures.

The findings which show this further US CDC research fraud were published in the Lancet medical journal. The CDC could not justify the figures but the CDC paper has not been retracted by the publishing journal: Health Economics.  The correspondence with the journal can be found here: Letter to the Editor Policy analysis of the   use of Hepatitis B, Hemophilus  influenzae type B, Streptococcus pneumoniae-conjugate  and Rotavirus vaccines   in   the   National   Immunization Schedules. HEALTH ECONOMICS Health Econ. 13: 1147–1148 (2004).

The correspondence and response of the US CDC author can be read here.

Flu Vaccine 13 Deaths – Italy – Authorities Fail to Prove Vaccine Not Responsible

CHS reported here on the recently reported deaths following flu vaccine: Official Investigation As 13 Die Following Flu Vaccine – Italy

Now it is being reported: ‘No evidence’ Fluad flu vaccine caused deaths in Italy

There are a number of problems with this report.   When precautionary measures are needed, the evidence the public need is that the vaccine did not kill, not that there is no evidence it did.  There appears to be no evidence the vaccine did not kill the 13 victims.  There is evidence the deaths followed very shortly after the vaccine.  Vaccines are fast tracked and not properly tested for safety.  They are not subjected to the “gold standard” of testing – the randomised placebo controlled trial.

And as a public health measure they do not work – yet health authorities continue to push flu vaccines on the population not because they do work but because these are mass experiments on living human populations with products which are not proven safe.  And then the adverse reactions are heavily under-reported and the data misreported to pretend dangerous vaccines are safe, as CHS has reported previously:

UK Drug Safety Agency Falsified Vaccine Safety Data For 6 Million

UK Fakes Flu Death Numbers

New Study – Flu Vaccine Doesn’t Work

New York Times – Flu Vaccine Does Not Work – Yet More Research Says

Australia Bans Flu Vaccine – Child In Coma – Many Hospitalised

Children Get Narcolepsy From Flu Vaccine – Confirmed in British Medical Journal

US Drug Company Released Deadly Virus In EU In Vaccine

New Flu Risk From Vaccine – “a very effective way to spread flu” – New Nasal Spray Vaccine

Piers Morgan Very Sick Days After USA TV Flu Shot Stunt Backfires – Piers Told “Don’t Ever Take A Flu Shot Again”

Children Risk Untested Flu Vaccines In Hyped Pandemic

“Children to Die” – Latest Flu Scaremongering

World Pandemic Health News Round-Up

Swine ‘Flu Jokes

“Don’t give children flu jab” says chief medical officer

US Docs “Children to Die” In Flu Non-Pandemic

EU Takes Emergency Measures Over Glaxo’s ‘Flu Vaccine – Causes Narcolepsy in Children

CBS News Investigation – Forced Swine Flu Vaccination Under Obama’s “National Emergency” Based on Wildly Exaggerated Statistics

Australian Government Dumps On Sick Kids Injured by ‘Flu Vaccine

Flu Vaccine Caused 3587 US Miscarriages & Stillbirths

Flu Vaccine Cripples Healthy US Cheerleader for Life

EU And Canada Flu Vaccine Ban – Not Reported By Press

Now UK Recalls Another Novartis Flu Vaccine – Agrippal – Recall Follows EU and Canadian Bans of Agriflu and Fluad Flu Vaccines

EU Flu Vaccine Bans Still Unreported – Medics Sick After Vaccine Refuse More

Most UK Medics Refusing Flu Vaccines – UK’s New Chief Medical Officer Resorts To Bullying

Official Investigation As 13 Die Following Flu Vaccine – Italy

Italy Investigates Novartis Flu Vaccine After 13 Deaths are Reported

Ed Silverman – Pharmalot – Wall Street Journal – 1st Dec 2014

Italy has suspended the use of two batches of the Fluad flu vaccine made by Novartis after 13 people died shortly after the treatment was administered.


The episode occurs shortly before Novartis is due to transfer its vaccines business to GlaxoSmithKline as part of an asset swap deal in which Glaxo will transfer most of its cancer portfolio to Novartis. A Glaxo spokeswoman declined to comment.

This is the not the first time that Novartis has run into difficulties with vaccines produced in Italy. Two years ago, the drug maker suffered what it called a “data-handling discrepancy,” which caused some vaccines to be temporarily and voluntarily held for several months. Novartis inspected its manufacturing practices and submitted reports to the EMA and AIFA before shipments resumed.”

Previous CHS articles on flu vaccine:

Children Get Narcolepsy From Flu Vaccine – Confirmed in British Medical Journal

Vaccine Maker GlaxoSmithKline To Gain US$480,000,000 From Causing Narcolepsy in 800 Children With Its Flu Vaccine

New York Times – Flu Vaccine Does Not Work – Yet More Research Says

New Study – Flu Vaccine Doesn’t Work

UK Fakes Flu Death Numbers

Governments Fake Flu and Measles Death Estimates

Can You Trust Known-to-be Corrupt Governments When They Also Push Useless Flu Vaccines – US Talk Radio Dr Michael Savage On The Savage Nation January 11, 2013

Australia Bans Flu Vaccine – Child In Coma – Many Hospitalised

US Drug Company Released Deadly Virus In EU In Vaccine

New Flu Risk From Vaccine – “a very effective way to spread flu” – New Nasal Spray Vaccine

Piers Morgan Very Sick Days After USA TV Flu Shot Stunt Backfires – Piers Told “Don’t Ever Take A Flu Shot Again”

Children Risk Untested Flu Vaccines In Hyped Pandemic

“Children to Die” – Latest Flu Scaremongering

World Pandemic Health News Round-Up

Swine ‘Flu Jokes

“Don’t give children flu jab” says chief medical officer

US Docs “Children to Die” In Flu Non-Pandemic

EU Takes Emergency Measures Over Glaxo’s ‘Flu Vaccine – Causes Narcolepsy in Children

CBS News Investigation – Forced Swine Flu Vaccination Under Obama’s “National Emergency” Based on Wildly Exaggerated Statistics

Australian Government Dumps On Sick Kids Injured by ‘Flu Vaccine

Flu Vaccine Caused 3587 US Miscarriages & Stillbirths

Flu Vaccine Cripples Healthy US Cheerleader for Life

EU And Canada Flu Vaccine Ban – Not Reported By Press

Now UK Recalls Another Novartis Flu Vaccine – Agrippal – Recall Follows EU and Canadian Bans of Agriflu and Fluad Flu Vaccines

EU Flu Vaccine Bans Still Unreported – Medics Sick After Vaccine Refuse More

Most UK Medics Refusing Flu Vaccines – UK’s New Chief Medical Officer Resorts To Bullying

53,000 Paralysis Cases in India From Polio Vaccine In A Year – NPAFP Identical to Polio But Twice as Deadly

How to declare a vaccine programme a success?  Redefine the disease and then claim it is being eradicated with a vaccine whilst still causing paralysis under a different name “Non Polio Acute Flaccid Paralysis“.

NPAFP is clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly as revealed in a peer reviewed journal and reported by CHS here: New Paper – Polio Vaccine – Disease Caused by Vaccine Twice As Fatal – Third World Duped – Scarce Money Wasted – Polio Eradication Impossible

A report in India last January, from the second largest business newspaper in India “LiveMint”, with an exclusive relationship with the Wall Street Journal, records:

In the past 13 months, India has reported 53,563 cases of NPAFP at a national rate of 12 per 100,000 children—way above the global benchmark set by WHO of 2 per 100,000.” India to get polio-free status amid rise in acute flaccid paralysis cases  Jan 13 2014

India has provided the evidence to indicate that Non Polio Acute Flaccid Paralysis is a disease associated with the polio vaccine.  The vaccine contains live polio virus, so when administered artificially is a means of causing a polio infection.

The LiveMint article reports:

Two doctors from Delhi’s St Stephens Hospital, Neetu Vashisht and Jacob Puliyel, who compiled data from the national polio surveillance project, found a link between the increase in dosage of polio vaccination and the increasing cases of NPAFP.
“Most experts will tell you the cases of NPAFP have increased because of better surveillance. This is bunkum,” said Puliyel. “As per global benchmarks, as polio incidence comes down, the rate of NPAFP should also reduce. Instead, AFP cases have been increasing steadily.”
“In 2010, the government reduced the number of pulse polio doses from 10 to 6. What we found was that between 2010-2013, the number of APF cases also came down. Our paper argues that other kinds of polio are being caused by the excessive administration of polio dosages,” Puliyel said. “Another proof is that states like Kerala and Goa, where dosages were less, AFP cases was also less. Majority of NPAFP cases are reported from Bihar and UP, where several immunization rounds are held to reach universal coverage. These are figures the government does not want to admit.”

Five Die After Flu Vaccine

The report below from Natural News demonstrates that whilst the threat of bird flu in humans is hypothetical, the threat to humans from the flu vaccine itself appears real [as B list celebrity Piers Morgan demonstrated live on US TV: Piers Morgan Very Sick Days After USA TV Flu Shot Stunt Backfires – Piers Told “Don’t Ever Take A Flu Shot Again”].

– – – – – – – – –

Five seniors die in Georgia care center after receiving flu shot – report

(NaturalNews) Healthcare workers at Hope Assisted Living & Memory Care Center in Dacula, Georgia, whose identities have not been made known as of this writing, have informed Health Impact News that on November 7, 2014, five residents of the center received flu vaccinations, only to die one week later.(1)

The workers also explained that these individuals immediately developed a fever after receiving the flu shot. Furthermore, they maintain that the number of people who died during the time frame in which they did is significant; not only was it in the days that followed their flu shot, but one source notes that, typically, the center “maybe loses a couple of people every 6 months or longer to Alzheimers,” but five people in a one-week period is very atypical.

For the full story click here:

Five seniors die in Georgia care center after receiving flu shot – report

Related CHS articles:

Flu Vaccines

Australia Bans Flu Vaccine – Child In Coma – Many Hospitalised

Children Get Narcolepsy From Flu Vaccine – Confirmed in British Medical Journal

US Drug Company Released Deadly Virus In EU In Vaccine

New Flu Risk From Vaccine – “a very effective way to spread flu” – New Nasal Spray Vaccine

Piers Morgan Very Sick Days After USA TV Flu Shot Stunt Backfires – Piers Told “Don’t Ever Take A Flu Shot Again”

Children Risk Untested Flu Vaccines In Hyped Pandemic

“Children to Die” – Latest Flu Scaremongering

UK Fakes Flu Death Numbers

World Pandemic Health News Round-Up

Swine ‘Flu Jokes

“Don’t give children flu jab” says chief medical officer

US Docs “Children to Die” In Flu Non-Pandemic

EU Takes Emergency Measures Over Glaxo’s ‘Flu Vaccine – Causes Narcolepsy in Children

New Study – Flu Vaccine Doesn’t Work

CBS News Investigation – Forced Swine Flu Vaccination Under Obama’s “National Emergency” Based on Wildly Exaggerated Statistics

Australian Government Dumps On Sick Kids Injured by ‘Flu Vaccine

Flu Vaccine Caused 3587 US Miscarriages & Stillbirths

Flu Vaccine Cripples Healthy US Cheerleader for Life

EU And Canada Flu Vaccine Ban – Not Reported By Press

Now UK Recalls Another Novartis Flu Vaccine – Agrippal – Recall Follows EU and Canadian Bans of Agriflu and Fluad Flu Vaccines

EU Flu Vaccine Bans Still Unreported – Medics Sick After Vaccine Refuse More

Most UK Medics Refusing Flu Vaccines – UK’s New Chief Medical Officer Resorts To Bullying

New York Times – Flu Vaccine Does Not Work – Yet More Research Says

Cumulative Aluminium Exposure and Neurological Disorders

Review Article Aluminum-Induced Entropy in Biological Systems: Implications for Neurological Disease

Journal of Toxicology 10/2014; Shaw, C.A., Seneff, S., Kette, S.D., Tomljenovic, L., Oller, J.W. and Davidson, R.M. (2014). Aluminum-Induced Entropy in Biological Systems: Implications for Neurological Disease. Journal of Toxicology, 2014, 27.. DOI: 10.1155/2014/491316

ABSTRACT Over the last 200 years, mining, smelting, and refining of aluminum (Al) in various forms have increasingly exposed living species to this naturally abundant metal. Because of its prevalence in the earth’s crust, prior to its recent uses it was regarded as inert and therefore harmless. However, Al is invariably toxic to living systems and has no known beneficial role in any biological systems. Humans are increasingly exposed to Al from food, water, medicinals, vaccines, and cosmetics, as well as from industrial occupational exposure. Al disrupts biological self-ordering, energy transduction, and signaling systems, thus increasing biosemiotic entropy. Beginning with the biophysics of water, disruption progresses through the macromolecules that are crucial to living processes (DNAs, RNAs, proteoglycans, and proteins). It injures cells, circuits, and subsystems and can cause catastrophic failures ending in death. Al forms toxic complexes with other elements, such as fluorine, and interacts negatively with mercury, lead, and glyphosate. Al negatively impacts the central nervous system in all species that have been studied, including humans. Because of the global impacts of Al on water dynamics and biosemiotic systems, CNS disorders in humans are sensitive indicators of the Al toxicants to which we are being exposed.

Examples of Harassment, Abuse And Online Bullying By Friends of Dishonest Liar Dr David Gorski

The friends of dishonest liar Dr David Gorski [Managing Editor of Dr Stephen Novella’s sciencebasedmedicine blog] have kindly obliged in demonstrating one of their techniques of online bullying, abuse and harassment.  Despite being asked numerous times to stop using Twitter to engage in bullying, abuse and harassment they continued. 

One of them,  claims to be a doctor with the British National Health Service. 

This shows the mindset of people who deny the evidence of harm caused by vaccines with over 1 in 60 children in numerous countries now having autism and now also repeated acknowledgements by numerous US government officials that there is evidence implicating vaccines in this international health disaster many thousands of times more serious than Ebola or anything else which has been going on unaddressed for nearly 30 years by the medical “experts”.

Autism is the #1 health problem in children in the developed world outstripping all other childhood illness.

Here is an example of Gorski’s friends – Sisyphus :



stop abusing harassing and spamming us

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

Yet again stop abusing harassing and spamming us

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

Stop abusing harassing and spamming us

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

Stop abusing harassing and spamming us

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

Stop abusing harassing and spamming us

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

A further time – stop abusing harassing and spamming us.

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

A further time – stop abusing harassing and spamming us.

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

A further time – stop abusing harassing and spamming us.

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

Again – stop abusing harassing and spamming us.

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

And again – stop abusing harassing and spamming us.

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

And a further time – stop abusing harassing and spamming us.

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

A further time – stop abusing harassing and spamming us.

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

And again – stop abusing harassing and spamming us

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

For a further time stop abusing harassing and spamming us.

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

Just stop abusing harassing and spamming us.

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

And for a further time stop abusing harassing and spamming us.

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

And again and again – stop abusing harassing and spamming us.

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

We are still asking. Stop abusing harassing and spamming us.

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

How come you are still doing it? Stop abusing harassing and spamming us.

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

We ask yet again stop abusing harassing and spamming us.

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

Again stop abusing harassing and spamming us.

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

Stop abusing harassing and spamming us.

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

stop harassing and spamming us

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

And yet again stop harassing and spamming us.

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

stop abusing harassing and spamming us

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

Stop harassing and spamming us.

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

Yet again stop harassing and spamming us.

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

And again stop harassing and spamming us.

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

Stop harassing and spamming us.

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

Yet again stop spamming us.

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

Stop spamming us asked yet again.

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

Yet again. Stop spamming us.

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

Fine. So stop spamming us with all these tweets.

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

Stop spamming us

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

You keep on spamming us when we have asked you to stop. So stop now.

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

We do not know you who are so stop spamming us

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

Stop spamming us with all these tweets. It is harassment.

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

Again. Stop spamming us.

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

Sisyphus 4m4 minutes ago patterns and connections that sometimes mirages.

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

Sisyphus 4m4 minutes ago intuition. Our brains are deception engines programmed through evolution to look for

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

Sisyphus 4m4 minutes ago are good (Breast Cancer Awareness) or bad (Anti Vaccination). The myth of the “mothers

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

Sisyphus 4m4 minutes ago see the pediatrician. Women are more organized for causes as well. Whether those causes

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

Sisyphus 4m4 minutes ago The majority are. It has been a historical thing that mothers take their children to

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

Book Rogers 8m8 minutes ago Are most anti-vaxxers women? Interesting.

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

Sisyphus 22m22 minutes ago AoA primary membership is women/mothers. It’s reality commentary.

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

Book Rogers 2h2 hours ago I like the idea behind this, but the cartoon feels a little sexist. Silly women!

0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

CDC’s Immunization Safety Director Concedes “Possibility” That Vaccines Trigger Autism


Following the admission by #CDCwhistleblower Dr William Thompson, a senior Centers for Disease Control scientist, that the CDC published studies which hid data showing vaccines cause autism  investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson reports here the recent concession by the CDC’s Immunization Safety Director, Dr Frank Destefano, of the “possibility” that vaccines trigger autism.  You can also read the transcript and listen to Attkisson’s interview with Destefano here

Destefano is associated with the scandal of the CDC commissioning research involving research fraudster Dr Poul Thorsen: CDC Frauds: Connections Between the DeStefano Paper and the Thorsen Affair.

The disclosures by #CDCwhistleblower Dr William Thompson were reported by CHS here: Breaking News – US Centers for Disease Control Lied in Denials of Research Fraud Cover-up That MMR Vaccine Causes Autism – CDC Long History of Lies and Research Fraud Revealed.

Attkisson now reports:

CDC’s immunization safety director says it’s a “possibility” that vaccines rarely trigger autism but “it’s hard to predict who those children might be.” (They’re not even trying.)

A CDC senior epidemiologist stepped forward last week to say that he and his CDC colleagues omitted data that linked MMR vaccine to autism in a 2004 study. The scientist, William Thompson, said “I regret that my coauthors and I omitted statistically significant information.”

Dr. Frank DeStefano, CDC Director of Immunization Safety

A coauthor of the questioned study is Dr. Frank DeStefano, Director of the CDC Immunization Safety Office. In a telephone interview last week, DeStefano defended the study and reiterated the commonly accepted position that there’s no “causal” link between vaccines and autism.

But he acknowledged the prospect that vaccines might rarely trigger autism.

“I guess, that, that is a possibility,” said DeStefano. “It’s hard to predict who those children might be, but certainly, individual cases can be studied to look at those possibilities.”

It is a significant admission from a leading health official at an agency that has worked for nearly 15 years to dispel the public of any notion of a tie between vaccines and autism. Vaccines are among the most heralded medical inventions of our time. Billions of people have been vaccinated worldwide, countless lives have been saved and debilitating injuries prevented. The possibility that vaccines may also partly be responsible for autism, in individual cases, is not something public health officials are typically eager to address.

Read the full article here:

CDC: “Possibility” that vaccines rarely trigger autism (AUDIO) by on September 2, 2014 in Medical & Vaccines, News   27 Comments

Meanwhile opinion formers in the medical professions like childless unmarried Dr David Gorski of Wayne State University Medical School continue to berate concerned parents and with outright dishonesty about vaccine safety and efficacy:  Clear Proof’s Doctor David Gorski [aka ORAC] Is Dishonest And A Liar – And If You Find A Bigger Gorski Lie To Better This Example Let Us Know

Usefulness of Hepatitis B Vaccine Questioned – the vaccination did not reduce hepatitis B carrier rate – defeating the primary aim of the immunization programme

An Editorial in Indian Pediatrics the journal of the Indian Academy of Pediatrics has again raised doubts about the usefulness of Hepatitis-B vaccination in India.  The full article can be downloaded here: Utility of Hepatitis B Vaccination in India Pediatrician’s Perspective

Results of the pilot study launched in Andhra Pradesh to evaluate the usefulness of the vaccine have been published in the latest issue of Indian Pediatrics.

In an accompanying editorial Rajeev Kumar and Jacob Puliyel of the Department of Paediatrics at St. Stephens Hospital say the results are clear evidence that the vaccine has not been very useful:

If the findings of this study are replicated in other areas, it should prompt a re-evaluation of the need for this vaccine in the immunization programme of the country” the editorial says.  

Twelve years ago the Global Alliance on Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) provided India with Rs.271.9 million to study Hepatitis B vaccination in India. No study of efficacy was undertaken and universal immunization was introduced in a phased manner.

Hepatitis B spreads like AIDS from mother to child or from person to person through contaminated needles or sexual contact. However unlike AIDS, the majority of those who get infected with Hepatitis B clear the organism from their bodies. A few however do not clear the virus and become chronic carriers. Some chronic carriers develop liver cancers or cirrhosis of the liver, 40 years later. Vaccination is meant to reduce the numbers who become chronic carriers and long term problems.

The pilot study in rural Andhra Pradesh looked at over 2500 children who were given the vaccine against a similar number who had not received the vaccine and used as control group.

The study found that the incidence of chronic carriers was similar, regardless of vaccination status or, in other words,

the vaccination did not reduce hepatitis B carrier rate,” defeating the primary aim of the immunization programme, the editorial says.

Protective levels of antibodies fell rapidly among the vaccinated and by 11 years only 13% were protected. On the other hand among those not vaccinated, 33% had developed natural immunity by 6 years of age.

Kumar and Puliyel note that Hepatitis-B vaccine in now being given as Pentavalent vaccine in combination with DPT and Hib (Haemophilus influenzae type B) vaccines. They say that:

the efficacy of Hepatitis-B vaccine when given mixed with other vaccines “is likely to be even lower than what was reported in the study that was conducted with Hepatitis-B as a stand-alone vaccine.”

The editorial also notes that with introduction of Pentavalent vaccine, immunization uptake has fallen dramatically – perhaps related to sporadic reports of deaths with the vaccine. According to the 4th District Level Household Survey (DLHS-4: 2012-13), the numbers of the fully immunized in states with good coverage in the past, like Tamil Nadu, fell by as much as 25% in 4 years to a mere 56%.

This would further reduce the benefits in field-condition from the Hepatitis B vaccination programme,” Kumar and Puliyel point out.

According to the editorial, the findings of the pilot study support the contention that Hepatitis B is widespread but it is a benign disease in India possibly because of characteristics of the circulating virus strain and the genetic makeup of the population. The editorial concludes that need for this vaccine in the immunization programme should be reconsidered if the findings are replicated in other areas in India.

Clear Proof’s Doctor David Gorski [aka ORAC] Is Dishonest And A Liar – And If You Find A Bigger Gorski Lie To Better This Example Let Us Know


It is a serious matter when a medical doctor abuses the trusted status of a licensed medical professional to abuse bully disparage and attack others. It is worse when he uses that status and trusted position to lie about published medical research to make false claims intended to mislead and actively spread deliberate misinformation about medical knowledge whilst doing so to make false claims about others.  It is even worse when he does it so publicly and routinely, publishing to mislead people worldwide and on a daily basis on the internet. 

Here on CHS we examine just one deliberate intentional lie by Dr Gorski, the circumstances in which he made that lie and look at some implications.  The lie we are interested in is published on the website  It is in an attack blog directed against investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson for her work exposing the scandal of vaccines causing autism in hundreds of thousands of US children.  Dr David Gorski engages in his dishonest bullying conduct against a number of other people in the same blog post.

But first some background and we also invite readers to post comments here with other examples of Dr Gorski’s’s lies which they believe they have found to see if they can better our example.

Dr Gorski’s behaviour reveals him as a pseudoscientist and quack.  And it indicates Dr Gorski may not be of good moral character – which is what his dishonesty suggests.

This kind of behaviour also brings all of modern medicine into disrepute and taints all medical doctors.  Government health officials are able to avoid answering difficult questions hiding behind bloggers like Gorski who distract attention whilst spreading blatant misinformation and attacking wrongfully the characters and credibility of independently minded people who ask and even sometimes answer the questions health officials prefer to avoid. 

It of course also tells the world about the website  Dr David Gorski is its Managing Editor.  What are the other editors doing about Gorski’s deliberate lies and online bullying?  Do they condone Dr Gorski’s behaviour?  Have they done anything to stop it?  Do they intend putting matters right?  Gorski has been doing this kind of thing for many years. 

The other editors are: Stephen P Novella; Kimball C. Atwood IV, MD; Mark A. Crislip, MD; Harriet Hall, MD; and Paul Ingraham [a former Registered Massage Therapist in Vancouver, Canada]. 

Are they liars too?  We do not know about that because we have not considered any of their work.  But if they do nothing then that tells you something about them.

Dr David Gorski seems to lie as a matter of routine.  Worse still he asserts he relies on science when he is just lying.  Gorski of course is not the only liar.  On CHS we have highlighted other liars who have been caught lying blatantly, in some instances having to apologise and pay compensation.

So what are the implications of Gorski’s cyber bullying and lying under the requirements to be met by a licensed medical practitioner in the State of Michigan? [Dr Gorski practices medicine in Michigan].

The Michigan Board of Medicine appears to be responsible for enforcing for the practice of medicine the Public Health Code under Public Act 368 of 1978, as amended. Section 16221 contains a multitude of behaviours but lying appears to fall under a “lack of good moral character“.  After all, if a licensed medical professional lies about medical knowledge to mislead others and so publicly that does not sound like someone of good moral character, does it? 

But that is not all.  If Dr Gorski advises and treats patients on the basis of the kind of defective untrue and misleading information he published on his blog then he may violate other requirements.  Violations include negligence or failure to exercise due care as well as any conduct or practice that impairs, or may impair, the ability to safely and skillfully practice medicine.  And it may also indicate a lack of competence to advise and treat patients in accordance with his obligations.  Incompetence can be a violation. A mental inability reasonably related to and adversely affecting the licensee’s ability to practice in a safe and competent manner can also violate the Code.  That raises the question of whether Dr Gorski’s psychological profile as revealed by his blogging activities and specifically his inability to be truthful about medical scientific matters makes him psychologically unfit to treat patients.  That is not a question for CHS to answer but it would seem an appropriate question to ask.

So what did the liar Dr David Gorski do?  He published one of his usual rambling articles on the website.  It was 3333 words entitled “Anti-vaccine propaganda from Sharyl Attkisson of CBS News published on April 4, 2011. 

You can see this was not a trivial matter.  Gorski attacked a prominent US journalist along with a number of other people and he lied to do it.  Ms Attkisson reported for CBS News on a peer reviewed journal paper published by Dr Helen Ratajczak.  Ms Attkisson’s report included:

The article in the Journal of Immunotoxicology is entitled “Theoretical aspects of autism: Causes–A review.” The author is Helen Ratajczak, surprisingly herself a former senior scientist at a pharmaceutical firm. Ratajczak did what nobody else apparently has bothered to do: she reviewed the body of published science since autism was first described in 1943. Not just one theory suggested by research such as the role of MMR shots, or the mercury preservative thimerosal; but all of them.

Vaccines and autism: a new scientific review By Sharyl Attkisson CBS News April 1, 2011

This is the part of Dr David Gorski’s article in which the lie appears and it is a significant lie:

And she cites the anti-vaccine blog Child Health Safety as one of her references? The date of the CHS entry cited is June 30, 2010. All I could find was this entry, which purports to argue that both Merck’s Director of Vaccines and the U.S. government have admitted that vaccines cause autism all based on  the long known science showing that a maternal case of rubella while carrying a fetus can result in autism in the child, something that’s been known for several decades and is in fact one reason why vaccination against rubella is so important. How on earth did this get through peer review. Obviously, the peer reviewers of Dr. Ratajczak’s article were either completely ignorant of the background science (and therefore unqualified) or asleep at the switch.

Notice our emphasis added to just three words “all based on“.  Dr Gorski chose those words to make sure his lie would be all the more convincing.  Those three words show how deliberate and calculated Dr Gorski was being in his lying and dishonesty.

And just to make sure we are comparing apples with apples, this is the CHS article Dr Gorski lied about Vaccination Causes Autism – Say US Government & Merck’s Director of Vaccines as it appeared when Dr Gorski wrote his blog post in April 2011. 

Notice how in his article Dr Gorski admits he found and read the article.  There is no mistake.  And of course Dr Gorski was making claims intended to damage the reputations of Ms Attkisson and Dr Ratajczak among others.  So it was deliberate, intentional and to cause harm to others.  And it was bullying cyber abuse.

Now what you can also see here is that Dr Gorski not only lied about the CHS article but he also lied about a number of other things [and this is just looking at the one paragraph] and all for the purposes of attacking Ms Attkisson and Dr Ratajczak.

Most people do not click on links in blog posts.  But this particular Gorski lie would be one CHS would know to be a lie without needing to refer to the CHS article concerned.  But we make sure you can refer to it to so you can see just how dishonest Doctor David Gorski MD is.

Contrary to Dr David Gorski’s contrived and dishonest claims, the admissions by Merck’s Director of Vaccines and U.S. government agencies that vaccines cause autistic conditions were not “all based on” autism caused by rubella infection.  They were not based on that at all.  And that is perfectly clear from the CHS article.  So Gorski despite having found and read the CHS article clearly lied and did so deliberately and intentionally with a remarkable degree of dishonesty. 

It is also plain for all to see that not only did the CHS article cover several known causes of autism and not just one [as the liar Dr Gorski claimed], but also the quotes admitting vaccines cause autism were in relation to further separate mechanisms by which that can happen. 

In addition to that the CHS article quoted, cited and linked to original sources including a number of peer reviewed medical journal papers.

What is also notable is the causes of autism which Dr Gorski omitted are causes which he steadfastly has avoided referring to.  It is difficult for him to deny the admissions made because they were made and the CHS article cited and linked to original sources showing that.  That is another aspect of his dishonesty.  He ignores completely evidence which goes against the political commercial views he publishes under contract on to support the drug industry and to support government officials in pressurising parents into giving dangerous unnecessary vaccines to their children.

But what it does show is that Dr Gorski knows those admitted causes are known real causes of vaccine-caused-autism.  If he were to contradict that he would also have to claim Merck’s Director of Vaccines and US Government agencies were lying when they made those admissions – admissions which were against their interests [but definitely in the public interest].  So Gorski avoids acknowledging the admissions, but in doing so tacitly confirms he knows they are true.

But Gorski did not stop there.  He lied also about it being improper of Dr Ratajczak to cite CHS in a peer reviewed journal.  But it would have been improper for Dr Ratajczak to take the benefit of the work of others without citing CHS as the source.  To do that would have been plagiarism.

Dr Ratajczak properly cited the source of the information, which itself cited original sources.  So Gorski lied again.  And of course Dr Gorski knows that. 

This also addresses a further lie by Dr Gorski, that the peer review system of the journal concerned was in some way defective by allowing such a citation.  Clearly, it was not and could not have been.

And that brings us to a final point.  That one Gorski paragraph is comprised of 133 words, yet it contains at least 3 lies.  So on that basis one might estimate 75 Gorski lies in just that one blog post of 3333 words.  And he blogs 6 days a week under contract, so that could be around 450 Gorski lies a week.  And over the course of a year it could be 22,500 lies p.a. making Dr Gorski quite an impressive liar by quantity.  And if contains that many lies from just one author, how many other lies might there be, if any?  

You should not hold your breath waiting for the Michigan Board of Medicine to do anything.  But what this information does is raise the question: if one doctor can lie that much in one year and so blatantly and publicly and get away with it, how many other doctors and “scientists” are lying too?  How many in the US Centers for Disease Control for example?