UK Government Caught Lying On Baby Hep B Vax Safety

add to del.icio.us ::Add to Blinkslist::add to furl ::Digg it::add to ma.gnolia::Stumble It! ::add to simpy ::seed the vine:: ::::TailRank

The British Government has been caught lying this week in news reports in two British Sunday newspapers about a proposal to give 8 week old British babies Hepatitis B vaccinations.

A Department of Health spokesman was quoted claiming:-

The safety of children is always paramount whenever decisions are taken regarding what vaccines are included as part of the child vaccination programme.: New vaccination fears over plan to give hepatitis jabs at eight weeks old Mail on Sunday 12th April 2009, Vaccination fears over plan for Hepatitis B jabs for babies : Sunday Telegraph 12 Apr 2009.

Only cost and not safety is legally permitted to be an objection under the UK New Labour Government’s new law in effect from April 1 this year [full details below].  Whilst 8 week old babies are not at risk from Hepatitis B, they are from the vaccine [full details below].  And six five EU Hepatitis B vaccines have lost their marketing authorisations since 2000, the latest being last week – GlaxoSmithKline’s Hepatitis B Energix B vaccine [full details below].

Hepatitis B vaccine has been shown in many peer reviewed research papers [including from Harvard University – detailed references at end] to be associated with numerous infant deaths  in the USA and Europe, multiple sclerosis and numerous chronic auto-immune disorders.  These latter include Guillain-Barre syndrome, lupus, rheumatism, blood disorders and chronic fatigue.  The only potential claimed infant risk group is alleged to be babies born in the UK to mothers from countries with claimed-to-have high rates of infection.  Around 2000 British born infants are already being vaccinated annually in the UK.  At risk groups are intravenous “recreational” drug abusers and those who practice unsafe sex – which rules out 8 week old babies.

There has been a criminal judicial investigation in France into the adverse effects of this vaccine.  France was the first country to introduce universal Hepatitis B vaccination and saw effects  which included the first ever seen and harrowing cases of childhood multiple sclerosis in France.

Research also shows that the prevalence of Hepatitis B is low in the UK, consistent with previous estimates and suggesting that many infections were acquired outside the UK. This all suggests Government should concentrate its efforts on effective treatment rather than vaccination of infants against a disease which does not affect them. Proponents of the vaccination claim rates of Hepatitis B infection are “spiralling” but based on “estimates”. Regrettably “estimates” can be “pulled” in one direction or another depending on which direction those responsible for the “estimates” are more interested in seeing them move.  And in these circumstances, they can never be justification for vaccinating all babies to protect adult drug abusers and practitioners of unsafe sex.

Additionally, UK and EU authorities have withdrawn marketing licences for 6 5 Hepatitis vaccines claiming a lack of efficacy in some cases, voluntary withdrawal by the applicant in others and denying in one case [Hexavac] any association with 6 infant deaths in Germany. The deaths were reported in a 2005 research paper as possibly caused by the vaccine: Unexplained cases of sudden infant death shortly after hexavalent vaccination.” Zinka B, Rauch E, Buettner A, Rueff F, Penning R. – Vaccine. 2005 May 18.

The most recent vaccine to lose its authorisation was last Last week the UK Medicines  and Healthcare Products regulatory Agency withdrew required recall of a batch of GlaxoSmithKline’s Hepatitis B Engerix B vaccine marketing authorisation with Professor Kent Woods, chief executive of the MHRA stating:-

The safety of the vaccine is not in question, but it is suspected to be ineffective.” MHRA recalls GSK’s Hepatitis B vaccine – 07 Apr 2009 – Regulatory Affairs – Hays Pharma News

The other most recent vaccine to lose its European marketing authorisation was  Quintanrix [also from GSK] in August last year. The other vaccines are: Infanrix [GSK], Hepacare [Celltech] and Primavax [Aventis Pasteur].

So if ‘The safety of children is always paramount’ why the British Department of Health is even contemplating such a vaccine for 8 week old babies is beyond comprehension.”

But there is worse to come and it shows the UK’s New Labour Government has been irresponsible handing recently from 1st April 2009 legal power to dictate vaccination policy exclusively to the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation: UK Government Hands Drug Industry Control of Childhood Vaccination.  The JCVI regrettably has a demonstrable track-record of recklessness on safety up to and including the present day, as shown in FOI documents: British Government’s Reckless Disregard for Child Health Safety and UK Government Hands Drug Industry Control of Childhood Vaccination.

 

The DoH statement published in The Mail on Sunday is also untrue because:-

  • Under the new law The Health Protection (Vaccination) Regulations 2009 which came into effect on 1st April for England only, the Secretary of State has no power on the grounds of safety to refuse to implement or reverse any Joint Committe on Vaccination and Immunisation recommendation
  • the JCVI expressly has no remit to take safety into account in its decision-making

    • [that role is supposedly the MHRA’s but regrettably they seem to rubber stamp a great deal of what the drug industry come up with – as has been shown time and again and not just with vaccines, but drugs like Seroxat – the “anti-depressant” shown not to work compared to placebo in some trials and which causes adolescents to be 3 times more likely to commit suicide in others.]

  • the only consideration the Secretary of State can take into account in rejecting JCVI recommendations is cost-effectiveness – not safety
  • contrary to the UK Department of Health claims, no childhood vaccines used on British children have ever been tested according to the gold standard of evidence – randomised placebo controlled clinical trials.

  • health officials refuse to ensure large scale studies of total health outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals are carried out.  These should show differences in overall health between these groups and some medical professionals believe this is because the studies would reveal the unvaccinated are healthier overall and high levels of chronic diseases in vaccinated individuals.

  • there is no clinical benefit to infants from Hepatitis B vaccine but infants are put at risk of the known and unknown adverse effects

  • this also means doctors and nurses are being expected to behave unethically and possibly criminally – because no caring parent will consent to a vaccine administered to an 8 week old baby on being told there are risks but no benefits

The main reason for the new drive to more and more vaccines – and this is well published in the trade press – is that the drug industry has been changing its business model.  The financial markets have known for many years the old model would fail – that of patented “blockbuster” drugs:-

  • the drug industry have made vaccines the new growth area because they are highly lucrative

    • they are drugs everyone gets – it is the same business model of Bill Gates’ Microsoft – pretty much everyone has to have Windows software – pretty much everyone gets vax’d

    • and the drug industry has been working hard behind-the-scenes to pursuade everyone – especially legislators – that they are vital when they are not and lobbying for changes in law just like this new law – which was introduced without Parliamentary debate and appears to be unlawful per se: UK Government Hands Drug Industry Control of  Childhood Vaccination

 

Dr Marc Girard, a specialist in the side effects of drugs and commissioned as a medical expert by French courts in the French criminal investigation into the introduction of universal Hepatitis B vaccination in France, suggests that even in high-endemic countries, the risk/benefit ratio of what he describes as “this unusually toxic vaccine” must be carefully re-assessed.

Regarding the health situation in the UK Dr Girard says the conclusion not to vaccinate is obvious. France was the first country to implement universal hepatitis B vaccination in 1994.

 

Whilst other evidence is embargoed by the French Courts, Dr. Marc Girard has also been able to publish a scientific review of the unembargoed evidence of the vaccine’s hazards (Autoimmun Rev 2005; 4: 96-100). Dr Girard shows that French health authorities suppress studies demonstrating serious risks.

Dr Girard has previously said:

Whilst the risk factors for babies have changed little, there is now impressive evidence that for a preventive measure, hepatitis B vaccine is remarkable for the frequency, variety and severity of complications from its use. The toxicity of this vaccine is so unusual that, even if crucial data are regrettably concealed or covered by Court order, scientific evidence is already far higher than normally needed to justify severe restrictive measures.

 

______________________________________

REFERENCES

UK & EU MARKETING AUTHORISATION WITHDRAWALS

  • MHRA recalls GSK’s Hepatitis B vaccine – 07 Apr 2009 – Regulatory Affairs – Hays Pharma News
  • Public Statement on Quintanrix (Common name: diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine) Withdrawal of the Marketing Authorisation in the European Union – 29/08/08 – EMEA/424484/08
  • EMEA announces recommendation for suspension of the marketing authorisation for HexavacEMEA/297369/2005
    • EMEA Questions and Answers on the suspension of Hexavac –  EMEA/304888/2005
  • EMEA Withdrawal of the Marketing Authorisation for the Medicinal Product Hepacare (Triple hepatitis B recombinant vaccine)EMEA/32933/02– 20/12/02
    • Public Statement on Hepacare (Triple hepatitis B recombinant vaccine)17/12/02 – EMEA/32933/02
  • Withdrawal of the Marketing Authorisation for the Medicinal Product Primavax (Diptheria, Tetanus, and Hepatitis B vaccine) – 04/12/00 – EMEA/H/2681/00

______________________________________

DEATHS, MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND OTHER ADVERSE EFFECTS

  • “Unexplained cases of sudden infant death shortly after hexavalent vaccination.” Zinka B, Rauch E, Buettner A, Rueff F, Penning R. – Vaccine. 2005 May 18

Vaccinations are considered to be the most effective and safe method preventing infectious diseases. Although hexavalent vaccines like Hexavac((R)) and Infanrix Hexa((R)) are assumed to be well tolerated and safe regarding the rate of immunity  [Liese JG, Stojanov S, Berut F, Minini P, Harzer E, Jow S, et al. Large scale safety study of a liquid hexavalent vaccine (D-T-acP-IPV-PRP-T-HBs) administered at 2, 4, 6 and 12-14 months of age. Vaccine 2002;20:448-54; Mallet E, Fabre P, Pines E, Salomon H, Staub T, Schodel F, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of a new liquid hexavalent combines vaccine compared with separate administration of reference licensed vaccines in infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2000;19:1119-27], it was noticed that several cases of death occurred shortly after the vaccination. We report six cases of sudden infant death that occurred within 48h after hexavalent vaccination. At post-mortal examination, those cases showed unusual findings, especially in the brain and in laboratory tests. Crude calculations of local epidemiology are compatible with an association between hexavalent vaccination and unusual cases of sudden infant death. If confirmed in systematic studies, our findings would have potentially serious clinical implications.

Results: Of 1771 neonatal reports, there were 18 deaths in 8 boys and 9 girls (1 patient unclassified). The mean age at vaccination for these 18 cases was 12 days(range, 1-27 days); median time from vaccination to onset of symptoms was 2 days (range, 0-20 days); and median time from symptoms to death was 0 days (range, 0-15 days). The mean birth weight of the neonates (n = 15) was 3034 g (range, 1828-4678 g). The causes of death for the 17 autopsied cases were sudden infant death syndrome for 12, infection for 3, and 1 case each of intracerebral hemorrhage, accidental suffocation, and congenital heart disease. Conclusion: Few neonatal deaths following HepB vaccination have been reported, despite the use of at least 86 million doses of pediatric vaccine given in the United States since 1991. While the limitations of passive surveillance systems do not permit definitive inference, these data suggest that HepB immunization is not causing a clear increase in neonatal deaths.

Recombinant hepatitis B vaccine and the risk of multiple sclerosis

NEUROLOGY 2004;63:838-842

A prospective study

Miguel A. Hernán, MD, DrPH, Susan S. Jick, DSc, Michael J. Olek, DO and Hershel Jick, MD

From the Department of Epidemiology (Dr. Hernán), Harvard School of Public Health, Boston; Boston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program (Drs. Susan S. Jick and Hershel Jick), Boston University, Lexington, MA; and Department of Neurology (Dr. Olek), College of Medicine, University of California, Irvine.

Background: A potential link between the recombinant hepatitis B vaccine and an increased risk of multiple sclerosis (MS) has been evaluated in several studies, but some of them have substantial methodologic limitations.

Methods: The authors conducted a nested case-control study within the General Practice Research Database (GPRD) in the United Kingdom. The authors identified patients who had a first MS diagnosis recorded in the GPRD between January 1993 and December 2000. Cases were patients with a diagnosis of MS confirmed through examination of medical records, and with at least 3 years of continuous recording in the GPRD before their date of first symptoms (index date). Up to 10 controls per case were randomly selected, matched on age, sex, practice, and date of joining the practice. Information on receipt of immunizations was obtained from the computer records.

Results: The analyses include 163 cases of MS and 1,604 controls. The OR of MS for vaccination within 3 years before the index date compared to no vaccination was 3.1 (95% CI 1.5, 6.3). No increased risk of MS was associated with tetanus and influenza vaccinations.

Conclusions: These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that immunization with the recombinant hepatitis B vaccine is associated with an increased risk of MS, and challenge the idea that the relation between hepatitis B vaccination and risk of MS is well understood.

Received March 31, 2004. Accepted in final form May 8, 2004.

“Multiple sclerosis and hepatitis B vaccination: Adding the credibility of molecular biology to an unusual level of clinical and epidemiological evidence” Comenge Y; Girard M (Med Hypotheses, doi 10.1016/j.mehy.2005.08.012)

“Autoimmune hazards of hepatitis B vaccine” Girard M (Autoimmun Rev 2005; 4:96-100) (Text available in electronic form on request.)

______________________________________

Low Prevalence in The UK of Hepatitis B and Infections acquired abroad

The prevalence of hepatitis B infection in adults in England and Wales – Epidemiology and Infection (1999), 122:133-138 Cambridge University Press

Cost effectiveness analyses of alternative hepatitis B vaccination programmes in England and Wales require a robust estimate of the lifetime risk of carriage. To this end, we report the prevalence of infection in 3781 anonymized individuals aged 15–44 years whose sera were submitted in 1996 to 16 microbiology laboratories in England and Wales. One hundred and forty-six individuals (3·9%) were confirmed as anti HBc positive, including 14 chronic carriers (0·37%). The prevalence of infection and carriage was higher in samples collected in London and increased with age. No increased risk of infection was seen in sera from genito-urinary (GUM) clinics. Only 15 sera positive for hepatitis B were also positive for hepatitis C. Our results confirm the low prevalence of hepatitis B in England and Wales, are consistent with previous estimates of carriage and suggest that many infections were acquired while resident outside the UK. Future prevalence studies should determine the country of birth and other risk factors for each individual in order to confirm these findings.  (Accepted September 14 1998)

8 Responses

  1. I ask again, ‘do the proponents of these poisons have their own family members vaccinated with the products. If so, knowing the dangers, are they not guilty of aggravated assault and in more serious outcomes, ‘manslaughter’?
    Public apathy has the population ‘sleepwalking’ into oblivion. With the autoimmune system compromised ‘big pharma’ will just keep coming up with another fix to correct the damage that they cause thus another money making product is born. Time for a new revolution. Everyone who reads this material should contact their MP/MEP. There is a huge – often unpleasant – group who protest about animal rights. Where are the protesters for the abuse of human health rights? The MHRA and the European authorities along with the FDA are under the financial ‘boot’ of the pharmaceutical giants. It is these same organisations that are also trying to ban natural herbs and foods.

  2. Hello, My name is Gabby, and I am a mother of two AUTISTIC boys: Joshua (4.5 years old) & Nicholas (2.5 years old)…

    My earliest memories daydreaming about just being a wife and mother … I met my soulmate and it was only a matter of time before the rest of my dreams were realized. I was sooooo excited and filled with Joy, Hopes, and dreams for my son to be… Joshua was born on October of 2003… a perfect little boy!!! He flipped over from back to front while he was being weighed for the first time, a strong child indeed…he fed well and slept all night long!!! But this was soon to end… before we left the hospital they took him to the nursery to get a shot (Hep B) so that he would be “safe”… When they brought him back all had changed, and this calm and serene child, would not stop crying. He became horse…and unable to cry like a normal child!!! He did not eat well, stopped sleeping through the night, and day. He was also jaundice (they never tested his levels, just said to put him in the sun as much as possible….) …They would tell me over and over that he was OK, that he was just a “colicky child”… What ever that means!

    As he received more vaccines his condition deteriorated more and more, That strong child became weak, low muscle tone, eye contact started to fade away, and language stopped. It all became more intense after his flu shot at 12months. But the pediatrician kept reassuring me that I was being paranoid, that the vaccines had nothing to do with all his problems…
    January 9th 2006, Joshua was diagnosed as SEVERELY AUTISTIC. A week prior to this I was diagnosed with CANCER ( lymphoma type B). Our second child Nicholas was only 5 months old!!! Breastfeeding had to be stopped. In preparation for upcoming Chemo – I had to have a procedure that would insert a Life Port in my chest, to be able to receive the chemo. Later came the radiation… Thank God for family – our support system!

    Once Nicholas became 18 months, he received the same diagnosis “AUTISM”… our world was shattered and all our hopes and dreams for our children were tossed away as we were told that there was nothing that could be done, but wait and expect the worse the older they got!!! But, giving up on our boys was not an option for us, I fought and survived CANCER so that we could beat AUTISM too!!!

    Unable to work because of my busy schedule as a “spectrum mom” and with limited funds, I started to research in every way possible. Our boys have received alternative treatments, some improvement here and there, but they have been neurologically affected ann… But I will never give up…

    Hepatitis B Shot/High Bilirubin/ ASD CONNECTION

    http://www.labtestsonline.org/understanding/analytes/bilirubin/test.html
    [ED: Edited – full text pasted]

    Newborns: Excessive bilirubin damages developing brain cells in infants (kernicterus) and may cause mental retardation, learning and developmental disabilities, hearing loss, or eye movement problems. It is important that bilirubin in newborns does not get too high. When the level of bilirubin is above a critical threshold, special treatments are initiated to lower it. An excessive bilirubin level may result from the accelerated breakdown of red blood cells due to a blood type incompatibility between the mother and her newborn (e.g., the mother is Rh-negative and has antibody to Rh-positive blood – the father is Rh-positive, and the fetus inherits this trait from him; the mother’s antibody crosses the placenta and causes the fetal Rh-positive red blood cells to hemolyze, resulting in excessively elevated bilirubin levels with jaundice, anemia, and possible kernicterus. )
    Adults and children: Bilirubin levels can be used to identify liver damage/disease or to monitor the progression of jaundice. Increased total or unconjugated bilirubin may be a result of hemolytic, sickle cell or pernicious anemias or a transfusion reaction. If conjugated bilirubin is elevated, there may be some kind of blockage of the liver or bile ducts, hepatitis, trauma to the liver, cirrhosis, a drug reaction, or long-term alcohol abuse.
    Inherited disorders that cause abnormal bilirubin metabolism (Gilbert’s, Rotor’s, Dubin-Johnson, Crigler-Najjar syndromes) may also cause increased levels.
    Low levels of bilirubin are not generally a concern and are not monitored.

    Is there anything else I should know?
    Although bilirubin may be toxic to brain development in newborns (up to the age of about 2–4 weeks), high bilirubin in older children and adults does not pose the same threat. In older children and adults, the “blood-brain barrier” is more developed and prevents bilirubin from crossing this barrier to the brain cells. Elevated bilirubin levels in children or adults, however, strongly suggest a medical condition that must be evaluated and treated.
    Bilirubin is not normally present in the urine. However, conjugated bilirubin is water-soluble and therefore may be excreted from the body in the urine when levels increase in the body. Its presence in the urine usually indicates blockage of liver or bile ducts, hepatitis or some other liver damage. The most common method for detecting urine bilirubin is using the dipstick test that is part of a urinalysis.
    Bilirubin levels tend to be slightly higher in males than females, while African Americans show lower values. Strenuous exercise may also increase bilirubin levels.

    Engerix hep B vaccine may raise risk of MS in kids:
    http://www.nlm. nih.gov/medlinep lus/news/ fullstory_ 69759.html

    Hepatitis B Vaccine & Adverse Reactions: http://www.umm. edu/altmed/ drugs/hepatitis- b-061000. htm
    Multiple sclerosis reported following administration of hepatitis B and other vaccines: http://us.gsk. com/products/ assets/us_ engerixb. pdf

    Disturbing facts:
    – Bilirubin levels tend to be slightly higher in males than females (just like ASD)
    – Newborns: Excessive bilirubin damages developing brain cells in infants (kernicterus) and may cause mental retardation, learning and developmental disabilities, hearing loss, or eye movement problems. It is important that bilirubin in newborns does not get too high.
    – Reasonst to test an infant are:If they have been exposed to hepatitis viruses (vaccine:Hep B at second day of birth in the hospiital)
    – shows evidence of jaundice
    – last but not least there is a well documented connection between Hep B vaccine and MS in children.

    All this symptoms and facts were present after my son received Hep B vaccine prior to leaving the hospital… One thing it does not mention is the nonstop crying (his voice went horse before we even left the hospital…) He was eating and sleeping fine prior to the shot and developed intolerance to protein after that… and just told me he was a coliky baby and dismissed any observation I had… And told me to go home and put my boy in the sun as much as posible… they never tested levels of bilirubin at all… I could tell he was in a very intence pain and kept on giving Tylenol (which depletes glutathione levels) prescribed by the Pediatrician, probably making things worse!!!
    I wish I knew then what I know now…And each time he received a new vaccine he kept having rashes and what not… until 1 year of age when he received MMR and a Flu shot all in one day… after that he went off the deep end and regressed more and more!!! Having very low muscle tone, difficulty with fine motor skills, Sleep depravation, difficulty digesting certain proteins, bloating, pain, and fatigue (this are all symptoms of my child having liver and brain damage). That Hep B shot was the first step we took & started our journey in to ASD world…

    And if you add to this the Mercury, Aluminum as well as other aditives in the shots, which have been recently discussed in the theory of vaccines causing micro-vascular stokes from Dr. Moulden… It just makes more sense … Our children have been injured… vaccine by vaccine and all of them contribute to more and more regressions!!! MMR is just the tip of the iceberg & the straw that broke the camel’s back…

    Love, Gabby. :0)
    http://stemcellforautism.blogspot.com/

    “I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin.” ~ Jerry Newport

  3. In current 2009 USA with an early Hep B vaccine introduced in 1991 there are today 1.7 million autism children.

    Nobody knows why these autism children have suddenly arrived in the USA from a base level of ZERO.

    Hep B does have a plausible official link to autism at least it did to the top Government, Vaccine Industry and Academic Scientists until the cloak of PROPAGANDA suddenly made all vaccines “safe” once again.

    This report shows vaccines are not always safe but in, retrospect are often LETHAL.
    IE. They KILL little children.

    250 000 USA parents, doctors and nurses have registered OBSERVED adverse effects after vaccines. The list grows rapidly but is often limited to one state in the USA, New Hampshire [ED: edited].

    The overuse and early use and toxic additions to vaccines have caused a TRAGEDY so far WITHOUT END.

    Who will PAY? [ED: Edited]

    Merck’s [ED: Edited] offering seems to be SEEK and DESTROY doctors who complain about drug safety issues.

    And [ED: Edited] the ten year hounding of Dr Andrew Wakefield who has not practised his trade due to these pressures.

  4. The British people need to know that this is not only an unnecessary vaccine, but a dangerous one. This is a story about an American baby who died shortly after a Hep-B newborn vaccine.

    http://iansvoice.org/default.aspx

    http://www.ageofautism.com/2009/02/managing-editors-note-below-is-the-story-of-iam-gromowski-a-boy-who-lived-47-days-after-his-hepatitis-b-vaccination-thank.html

  5. Thank you for this article. It is extremely important that the public be/get informed about the fundamental change that has taken place since 1 April, ie, putting the JCVI in charge of the vax programme. Not being answerable to Parliament/the public, they are a law unto themselves. And as you pointed out:

    “* the JCVI expressly has no remit to take safety into account in its decision-making”

    So the coup is complete. We are being set up for mandatory vaccination; and if a member of the public complains, their elected rep can now say: ‘Sorry – nothing to do with me. It’s up to the experts.’ The experts, who have massive conflicts of interest…

    And I suspect that the reason they want to add the HepB to the multiple vax is to hide its role in the resulting adverse events. When it’s given at birth, it’s too easy to be caught out & identified for its damage potential. These people are nothing if not clever. Or to be more precise: scheming.

    I accept that some public health authorities are, no doubt, sincere in their beliefs. But their beliefs are conditioned by their education. And their education is skewed along the lines neatly expressed by the principal investigator in the trial of Cervarix in the UK:

    “When a reported reaction is worse than would be considered normal, it is most likely to be a coincidence.”

    What a remarkable attitude. No awareness of the complete story of vaccines. No concern about the multitude of reports of extremely severe side effects. Just a simple, professional’s belief that the benefits ‘far outweigh’ the risks of vaccines. And thus will we never get safer vaccines through the auspices of these people. It doesn’t matter, to them. Your damaged child is simply collateral damage to them. Next…

    The only answer, apparently, to these sorts of people, is to say, firmly: Not with my child you won’t. And then maybe we will get some response, and changes made, from these our overlords. Not before.

    Stick to your guns, parents. It’s time – now, as never before, with this change in focus of responsibility to unelected overseers – for massive civil disobedience.

  6. [ED: Thanks for that. Evidence of directly untruthful information from WHO. The claim if a child is vaccinated the child will not get the disease, whereas research shows many vaccines appear to have an effect in only between 60 to 80 percent of individuals.

    And there are outbreaks of the diseases in highly vaccinated populations including 95 and 100 percent.

    How disgraceful of WHO, but it is the pharmaceutical industry’s worldwide marketing division after all.]

  7. Having overcome hodgkins, this was good to read. Thank you for this.

  8. This whole issue of mandated vacciines from birth on..is disgusting to me. It is like a parent has no choice but to approve a life of disability or death to their precious babies. If one does not agree to jab their children.. the Ped. Doctors are now pressured to not be their doctor no longer..as just happened to my Grandchildren…2 of them (boys) harmed by injected toxins when in fact no doctor or pharma knew if they had any underlining problems to cause a harmful problem to their bodies. This refusal of medical service is a delibrate strangulation to the parents, if the parents chose not to have anymore vaccines injected into the children after autism was a lable put on them just by viewing the child by vision, not by medical testing. And than to hide behind gov’t. with laws of no liability is the proof of guilt. If no guilt was an issue..there would be no reason to need protection of lawsuites…RIGHT? Where did the gov’t give the babies protection….NONE….A trade of a few days of measles for a life of disability does not sound like an even trade to me…..it sounds like a royal shaften. This being the U.S. Gov’t sticking it to the citizens again…and we have HomeLand Security?? Where?? The law ( Pharma liability protection) was hidden late at night after the votes were in…hidden in the HomeLand Security Act. Does that not explain the dirty pool of vaccines, gov’t and pharma? This corrupt act is world wide and all involved know it……

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: