To contact ChildHealthSafety over legal or other queries concerning any of our stories:-

Post a comment in the response box below or on any story and mark your comment “NOT FOR PUBLICATION”



[This email address only works if you omit “THEBIN” then the email address will work – we just put “THEBIN” in to stop spam]

We will endeavour to respond to all serious enquries promptly.

56 Responses

  1. Dear Sir/Ma’am:
    My stepsister’s son has autism; she had a lawsuit going (part of a class action, I believe). Last spring I asked her how the lawsuit was going. She told me they got a letter from the attorney that the lawsuit had been “dismissed” under “Homeland Security”. Of course it has absolutely nothing to do with “Homeland Security”. This is just another of the innumerable lies that we don’t have to tolerate any longer. Whether it’s mass murder on 9/11, or cumulative mass murder through Big Pharma, the AMA, and our medical system (far exceeding 9/11 and all of the wars combined), it needs to be exposed, stopped, and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Outside of the incessant talk about “overpopulation” and “population reduction” (going back to Malthus in the 1700s, or Prince Philip in recent years), if the deliberate nature of what’s being done (population reduction, making people sick, dumbing them down, etc.) might not be believed by most, here’s proof:

    1) Dumbed down populations are easier to control and “the people” are less of a threat to rogue-outlaw-murderous elements in government, as we have got now in the U.S. Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt was in the Reagan Administration’s Education Dept. and wrote this book (free download) about the deliberate dumbing down of America:

    2) Vladimir Lenin stated that “in order to control a country, you have to control the medical system of that country”. It’s well known that the New World Order (International Communism) has a financial control element for whom “the love of money” is their Bible. When an individual ceases being a “taxpayer” (forget about the antiquated word “citizen”; they don’t even refer to us as “citizens” on the floors of Congress, but as “taxpayers”) and goes on retirement or disability, a certain financial element behind the scenes sees that person (human being) as a “drain” on the system, and “better off dead”. This is accomplished through our socialized, controlled medical system (in no way is it “free market”). Many of the “delays”, “inefficiencies”, etc. of bureaucracies (Medicare, Medicaid, insurance companies, etc.) that cause grandma or grandpa to die while waiting for their coronary artery bypass, etc., are deliberate. If someone doubts that, see how efficient the IRS is when they want your money. Whereas most people working for Medicare, Medicaid, and insurance companies are good people trying to do what’s right, a certain financial element behind the scenes is looking at the matter, “Is this patient a taxpayer or a drain on the system (retired, on disability, etc.)?” This element sometimes has the final say over “delays” in providing the necessary care. It’s not fully implemented in the U.S. yet, but they were killing patients in hospitals in England in 2001 until they were caught and stopped. This was under their “socialized” medical system, “National Health Service”, and I was on the mailing list of a group that identified, and stopped, it.
    Does anybody believe that the Nazi and Stalinist mentalities have “left” this world, or only that they’ve become more sophisticated and subtle in their malevolence?

    3) Dr. Rima Laibow of Albert Einstein College of Medicine talks about the nefarious aspects of Codex Alimentarius, Nutricide, Big Pharma, and our medical system:

    I hope that everybody appreciates the malevolent nature of what is going on, and helps put a stop to it through the laws that the Constitution gives us the power to do (not “politicians”).

  2. Awesome, awesome blog!!!

  3. Hi,

    I am looking at this website for the first time, and I am finding it to be very interesting. I was wondering, what are the titles or roles of the members/authors of Child Health Safety (example: MD, RN, or family member etc.)? Thanks so much for your time.

  4. I’d like to point out that Fragile X is the most common known genetic cause of autism.
    There seems to be a cycle of doctors trying to prove that Autism is not genetic, rather than just looking at individuals and running the appropriate tests. EEG’s, genetic blood tests and other executive functioning tests.

    [ED: Frag X does not suffice. The numbers do not add up. There are not enough of people with the condition.

    We have 1 in 64 children with an autistic condition, 1 in 40 boys.

    Approximately 1 in 3600 to 4000 males in the world are born with the full mutation for Fragile X. The vast majority of males with the full mutation will have fragile X syndrome.

    Approximately 1 in 4000 to 6000 females in the world are born with the full mutation for Fragile X.

    And the first cause of autism known since 1964 is live rubella virus – which is in the MMR]

  5. What is in the 162/95 ethics approval.

    You have added to your website a defense of Walker-Smith dated January 25, 2010

    “Another key allegation in The Sunday Times’ journalist’s complaints to the GMC was that The Royal Free’s treatment of seriously ill autistic children with serious bowel disorder reported in the 1998 Lancet paper was simply research carried out without ethical approval. But the journalist was referring to the wrong ethical approval granted in December 1996 reference 172-96 when the applicable ethical approval was granted in 1995 reference 162-95. Ethics approval 162-95 was produced by Professor Walker-Smith’s defence team lawyers in the GMC. The production of this evidence contradicted numerous of the GMC’s allegations of professional misconduct against the doctors. In the 90 pages of GMC charges there are 113 references to 172-96. [added 25/Jan/2010].”

    What you don’t tell your readers is what is in 162/95.

    162/95 or 162-95 merely allowed Professor Walker-Smith to do at the Royal Free what he had done at his previous hospital, take two additional biopsies, for research purposes, during colonoscopies he was performing. He asked the ethics committee for it. It was NOT stated in the request as apre-condition of his moving to the Royal Free. This request, at the time in the mid 1990s, was considered so minor that the chairman approved it without a hearing of the committee.

    You can find this as part of the complaint to the GMC for the testimony of 5 doctors in the Wakefield hearing.

    Click to access 100120—gmc—first-amended-complaint-1.pdf

    or you can find the information on 162/95 taken from that complaint, with the editorial content removed and put in context at

    In either case, it had nothing to do with the research project of Wakefield, Walker-Smith and Murch.

    [ED: The above comprehensive mischaracterisation displays a lack of understanding of the relevant ethical practice of the time [emphasis added]:-

    The distinction between medical research and innovative medical practice derives from the intent. In medical practice the predominant intent is to benefit the individual patient ….. In medical research the primary intention is to advance knowledge so that patients in general may benefit: the individual patient may or may not benefit directly.
    Royal College of Physicians (1996) guidelines, paragraph 6.4.

    And what these seriously ill children were getting were clinical investigations needed to assess what ailed them. And as their parents would testify had they been called as witnessess [which the GMC failed to do] their children have benefitted.

    And what Brian Deer failed to disclose to the GMC or anyone else were the documents showing that throughout 1995 to publication of the Lancet paper in 1998 Walker-Smith and his team were operating under 162-95 for the research element of the Lancet paper.

    Now, how can that be a journalist acting out of public duty?

    End of story Sheldon101. And it looks like you post a lot on Huffington Post and keep coming back again and again saying the same things despite being repeatedly shown to be wrong.

    There is very little appetite or patience with that kind of behaviour here.]

  6. Fragile X is not autism; it’s Fragile X.
    Autism is mercury poisoning and the genetic marker for it is the APO-E4 protein.

  7. [ED: This was a posting by someone using a made up name and which accuses a number of people of being liars and other unnecessary remarks. We are accordingly not publishing it.

    We had previously commented:-

    There is very little appetite or patience with that kind of behaviour here.

    Sheldon101 [whoever that is] is now banned from this site.]

  8. Thanks for your articles. Very interesting. Please continue. We need organisations like yours


  9. You are my new hero, this stuff is golden! Spread spread spread the word. If there are no buyers then the sellers will disappear. The only reason they can get away with all this stuff is that we are buying their expired merchandise.

  10. I was about to recommend yours as the best website I found on autism until I found this:
    the article “Autism Rates Rocket – 1 in 38 British Boys – Cambridge Study” saying:
    – Dr Mayor Eisenstein of a Chicago USA family medical practice claims his practice has seen few or no autism cases amongst 35,000 unvaccinated child patients. –

    we find an article “NO AUTISM In Never-Vaccinated Children’ where Dr Mayor Eisenstein is quoted saying:
    “We have about 30,000 or 35,000 children that we’ve taken care of over the years, and I don’t think we have a single case of autism in children delivered by us who never received vaccines.”

    see the difference?

    [ED: Yes but as he is not certain “I don’t think we have a single case” it is more accurate to state, erring on the side of caution “few or no autism cases”. Without denigrating other interpretations such as that you cite, this is a value judgement in this particular case. We try generally to maintain high standards of accuracy and hope we are achieving that all or at least most of the time.]

  11. here’s another discrepancy:

    in your article:
    it say’s: “Dr. Max Wiznitzer, a key vaccine proponent admitted on Friday night’s US TV programme Larry King Live that the rate of autism in northeastern Ohio, the largest Amish community in the USA with low rates of vaccination, was 1 in 10,000.”

    on ‘Larry King Live’ the transcript

    WIZNITZER: Years ago, I thought about this idea among the Amish population here in northeast Ohio, to whom I am actually the neurologist. And I went to the public health nurses and said, tell me about their vaccination rates. And I was told that there is a very high rate of vaccination amongst the Amish population. Out of ten thousand of individuals in our population, we have one child with autism. I see all these children.

    Can it be that their transcript was changed or are you getting the facts wrong?

    [ED: Neither. We work on evidence.

    1) Wiznitzer is not a reliable witness. He is prepared to give expert testimony amounting to “Unconfirmed speculation” according to one Federal Court special master’s decision, in order to try to deny compensation to a child whose autistic spectrum condition was caused by vaccines – viz, in the case of Ben Zeller;

    2) Wiznitzer’s claim that vaccination rates are high in Amish communities is neither supported by the evidence of an experienced journalist and former UPI editor, Dan Olmsted nor the evidence in the formal published evidence base.

    Our experience of working with numerous professional journalists is the care they take over fact checking.

    The formal published evidence base includes “coverage levels for routine childhood vaccination remain low in many Amish communities.” Pertussis Outbreak in an Amish Community—Kent County, Delaware, September 2004–February 2005 JAMA. 006;296:1960-1964. MMWR. 2006;55:817-821

    3) It is a fundamental principle of evidence that where an opponent makes an admission in support of a proposition against his own interests that admission can be accepted as evidence in support of the proposition. Wiznitzer admits an autism rate of 1:10,000.

    So to put it more simply, A) Wiznitzer has demonstrated in Court testimony that his evidence is not reliable, B) the evidence independently of Wiznitzer contradicts Wiznitzer on vaccination rates in Amish communities C) Wiznitzer admits autism rates in Amish communities are very low and he is in an expert position to confirm that as a treating neurologist.]

    Can you believe everything Wiznitzer says? Or can you believe some but not other parts where independent evidence shows the contrary is true?

  12. Amazing site! I thought I had recorded of every site of significance on vaccines, health freedom, freedom & liberty vs. tyranny. Somehow I’ve missed this one.

    God bless you for this unreal compendium of powerful information. If this doesn’t spur the death of some, of what I believe are soon to be, dying paradigms–I don’t know what will!

    I am trying to figure out what internet and vaccine genius is responsible for pulling all this together so I can congratulate them.

    Thank-you, thank-you, thank-you for this work.

  13. Re Sheldon incident – I am receiving unpleasant messages froma former friend because of things I was supposed to have said to her in this forum – i have never been a member of this forum and never posted anything – please Ed could you contact me on [ED: email address edited]
    Anthony Morris

  14. ED: Sorry but this is not relevant to us. If you have never posted here, what comments on this site is your “friend” claiming you made here? Where are they?

  15. Hi Ed – I don’t know the exact nature of the comments – it was someone posing as me – I just wondered if Sheldon had anything to do with it and if so you might be able to relate this to her – Thanks

  16. Click to access SB0079.pdf

    Tennessee recently passed a “health freedom law”
    Which seems to read that you cannot be forced to receive any “health care” that you don’t want and that no government agency can “punish” you for not receiving health care or health insurance. Very vague. This could be pressed to say that State Schools can not demand vaccinations by its students.

    SECTION 1. Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 56, Chapter 7, Part 10, is amended by adding the following as a new section:

    (a) This section shall be known and may be cited as the “Tennessee Health Freedom Act.”

    (b) As used in this section:

    (1) “Health care services” means any service, treatment, or provision of product for the care of physical or mental disease, illness, injury, defect or condition, or to otherwise maintain or improve physical or mental health, subject to all laws and rules regulating health service providers and products within this state;

    (2) “Mode of securing” means to purchase directly or on credit or by
    trade, or to contract for third-party payment by insurance or other legal means authorized by the state of Tennessee, or to apply for or accept employer or government sponsored health care benefits under such conditions as may legally be required as a condition of such benefits, or any combination of the same;

    (3) “Penalty” means any civil or criminal fine, tax, salary or wage
    withholding, surcharge, fee or any other imposed consequence established by law or rule of a government or its subdivision or agency that is used to punish or discourage the exercise of rights protected under this chapter. – 2 – 00151918


    (1) The power to require or regulate a person’s choice in the mode of
    securing health care services, or to impose a penalty related thereto, is not found in the Constitution of the United States of America, and is therefore a power reserved to the people pursuant to the Ninth Amendment, and to the several states pursuant to the Tenth Amendment. This state hereby exercises its sovereign power to declare the public policy of this state regarding the right of all
    persons residing in this state in choosing the mode of securing health care services.

    (2) It is declared that the public policy of this state, consistent with our constitutionally recognized and inalienable right of liberty, is that every person within this state is and shall be free to choose or to decline to choose any mode of securing health care services without penalty or threat of penalty.

    (3) It is declared that the public policy of this state, consistent with our constitutionally recognized and inalienable right of liberty, is that every person within this state has the right to purchase health insurance or to refuse to purchase health insurance. The government may not interfere with a citizen’s right to purchase health insurance or with a citizen’s right to refuse to purchase health insurance. The government may not enact a law that would restrict these rights or that would impose a form of punishment for exercising either of these
    rights. Any law to the contrary shall be void ab initio.

    (4) The policy stated in this section shall not be applied to impair any
    right of contract related to the provision of health care services to any person or group. – 3 – 00151918

    (d) No public official, employee, or agent of this state or any of its political subdivisions shall act to impose, collect, enforce, or effectuate any penalty in this state that violates the public policy set forth in this section.

    SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon becoming a law, the public welfare requiring

    Submitted By: Teresa Gaddy

    The strength of this nation is rooted in its respect for all religions, or none, and it is for its refusal to honor one religion over others

  17. You mention on your blog the fraud with Paxil, here is a video about it:


  18. Thanks – now added to the full story here:
    More Fraud From Drug Giant GlaxoSmithKline Companies – Court Documents Show

  19. FOR YOUR INFORMATION – Use as you see fit.

    For the second time in five years, public health advocates are calling on the Food and Drug Administration to ban a fat-blocking drug sold over-the counter and via prescription, pointing to new reports of kidney stones and pancreatic damage.

    Public Citizen filed a petition with the FDA on Thursday calling on the agency to remove GlaxoSmithKline’s Alli and Roche’s Xenical from the market. Alli is sold over-the-counter while Xenical, a higher dose of the drug, is only available with a doctor’s prescription. Sales of both versions have been declining for years.

    Public Citizen says it identified 47 cases of acute pancreatitis and 73 kidney stones among patients taking the drugs. The reports were culled from the FDA’s public database of negative drug reactions.

    GlaxoSmithKline said in a statement that its drug is “the most studied weight loss medicine. Its safety has been established through 100 clinical studies involving more than 30 thousand patients.”

    In a separate announcement Thursday the British drugmaker said it plans to sell Alli along with several other over-the-counter drugs and vitamins. Glaxo plans to begin talks with interested parties in weeks.

  20. Further to above post ….

    Any U.S. citizen can file a petition with the FDA to ban a drug or medical device for safety issues. Most petitions are rejected, though Public Citizen has a rare track record of successful drug withdrawals. Last year, both the diet pill Meridia and painkiller Darvon were both withdrawn from the U.S. market, years after Public Citizen filed petitions against them.

  21. FOR YOUR INFORMATION – Use as you see fit again.

    Perhaps a search Glaxosmithkline on would be helpful.

    Oct. 7, 2005

    GlaxoSmithKline Misled FDA, Doctors and Patients with Faulty Asthma Drug Study, Public Citizen Writes in Lancet Medical Journal

    Drug Maker Included Data From Six Months After Trial Ended, Skewing Results

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – GlaxoSmithKline presented misleading results to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from a study of the popular asthma drug salmeterol (Serevent, known as Advair when combined with the steroid fluticasone), Public Citizen writes in a letter in this week’s issue of The Lancet.

    In 1996, the Salmeterol Multicenter Asthma Research Trial was initiated to study tens of thousands of asthma patients who received either salmeterol or a placebo. The study lasted 28 weeks and showed an increased risk of asthma-related death for those taking salmeterol. The results have never been published, although GlaxoSmithKline presented the interim results to the FDA in July 2003, when the drug came up for review before the FDA’s Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee. The company submitted final study data to the FDA on August 29, 2003.

    However, that data included adverse events that were reported six months after the trial ended and were not to be included, according to the original study protocol. The inclusion of the post-study data reduced the apparent dangers of salmeterol with respect to four critical study outcomes, including asthma-related death.

    GlaxoSmithKline did not clearly inform the FDA that the final study included data from six months after the trial had concluded until the FDA inquired about the results in April 2004. The FDA had presumed the data were only from the 28-week trial itself, since that was the “period of interest,” according to the FDA.

    Since learning of the suspicious reporting of the study results, the FDA’s Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee on July 13, 2005, recommended strengthening the warning on the labels for both Servent and Advair, but the agency has yet to make a final decision. Public Citizen learned of the misleading data presentation from materials provided to the advisory committee.

    “The behavior of GlaxoSmithKline in submitting these faulty data is deplorable,” said Dr. Peter Lurie, deputy director of Public Citizen’s Health Research Group and co-author of the letter. “Absent greater transparency at the FDA, we will never know how often this kind of self-serving data analysis occurs.”

    Public Citizen listed Serevent as a “Do Not Use” drug in its Worst Pills, Best Pills newsletter ( in March 2003 because of the interim study results.

    Salmeterol was dispensed more than 2.1 million times in U.S. pharmacies in 2004. The combination product, Advair, was dispensed more than 16.1 million times in U.S. pharmacies that year.

  22. Dear Drs. Eisenstein and Bradstreet:


    In Chicago, Homefirst Medical Services treats thousands of never- vaccinated children whose parents received exemptions through Illinois’ relatively permissive immunization policy. Homefirst’s medical director, Dr. Mayer Eisenstein, told us he is not aware of any cases of autism in never-vaccinated children; the national rate is 1 in 175, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “We have a fairly large practice,” Eisenstein told us. “We have about 30,000 or 35,000 children that we’ve taken care of over the years, and I don’t think we have a single case of autism in children delivered by us who never received vaccines. “We do have enough of a sample,” Eisenstein said. “The numbers are too large to not see it. We would absolutely know. We’re all family doctors. If I have a child with autism come in, there’s no communication. It’s frightening. You can’t touch them. It’s not something that anyone would miss.”

    Now that you’ve told us what you “think”, when will you collect the facts and publish the results

    This is a copy of my last email to the Reverend Spencer of Thakeham in West Sussex. He refuses to address the problem of childhood vaccination, and the severe damage it is causing, with no benefits whatsoever.

    Before you dispute my Subject title, please consider the overwhelming evidence I present. If you accept this evidence as being conclusive, then Doctors must be aware of it, and therefore are committing a crime. Please stifle any prejudices you may hold until you have examined the evidence. We are talking about the lives of very young children being taken, or left suffering from severe brain damage for the rest of their lives.

    One illustration not covered in the email below, but already given to the Reverend Spencer, concerns the cases of 900 children who were severely brain damaged after receiving the Pertussis vaccine. They were compensated in settlements Out of Court by the British Government as quietly as possible.

    I doubt you are aware of this.? Nor will you know that this vaccine, like every other, has never worked. Sweden abandoned the Pertussis vaccine 33 years ago after 84% of the 5140 Pertussis cases in 1978 had a record of having been vaccinated 3 times. As Dr Scheibner says below, vaccines actually cause the disease they are meant to protect against.I have plenty of evidence to back this up.

    The Pertussis vaccine is probably the most dangerous vaccine in the schedule, whether as a single, or part of the DPT Vaccine., and has been causing death and severe brain damage for more than 40 years.

    I wonder if all parents were given this information beforehand, and were also told that the deaths from Diptheria, Pertussis and Tetanus, are about 1 in 10 million or less, every year, would ever consent to vaccinating their children? The figures are much the same for the MMR constituents. 1 measles death pa in the UK. 1 mumps, and rubella death is virtually unheard of..

    Has any Doctor ever admitted that? Some observers are now maintaining both these triple vaccines are a criminal offence, since they are not required., and have never worked, as I keep saying.

    1 child in 50 in the UK is now Autistic. This figure has multiplied 17 Fold since vaccinations began in earnest in 1988. The Amish figure, who don’t vaccinate is 1 in 10.000. In Japan Autism charts rise and fall as a mirror of the rise and fall of all vaccinations. I have the charts. The Government continues to be in denial, and you will be aware of the witch-hunt against Dr Andrew Wakefield.

    For the past 3 years Courts, mainly in the US have been compensating children with Autism on the strength of the strong statistical links, and because some constituents of the vaccines are known to cause brain damage. The Governments are terrified the link will be absolutely proven, as it will leave their whole vaccination policy in tatters, and they and the Pharmas will be totally discredited.

  23. Dr Scheibner is a world expert on vaccines. Here is a reply she sent me on 30 September 2010.

    Dear John,
    Actually, I must correct you: I do not just give “a massive list of autoimmune diseases associated with the use Squalene”. I have accumulated and studied more than 100 000 pages of orthodox peer-reviewed medical papers published in the most reputable medical journals, (which amounts to more than 20 000 individual medical papers), but I have shown all vaccines as ineffective to prevent any diseases, instead making the recipients more susceptible to the very diseases that the vaccines are supposed to prevent and also to a host of related and unrelated bacterial and viral infections. I quote verbatim from medical papers. That is my strength and difference compared with other people.

    Everything in vaccines is toxic, starting with bacteria and viruses (as foreign proteins) and continuing with preservatives, adjuvants, coolant, etc etc.

    The only reaction that vaccines cause is harmful anaphylaxis, sensitisation, increased susceptibilty to diseases and substances.

    So, send your health minister a correction to your original submission quoting the above clarification of my findings.

  24. I was reading your responses over on the Science Based Parenting “article”. I was given that as PROOF about vaccine safety. I am loving your discussion with the Chris dude. I mean, this whole argument sounds just like what I was having with the person, including the cut outs where NO ONES stuff but people who support him counts.

    Thank you for the time and the info you gave.

  25. This site is a gold mine & soooooo appreciated. I come here all the time for information to help me in debates. I’m working here at the moment as a few of us teach a doctor & the Morman church what’s really going on. We are burying deception there as we have many places due to heroes like the creator of this awesome site helping us. We love you.

  26. I once had a little girl, brilliant, joyful, heathy. For two years I kept her home, and when she began morning preschool, I began her vaccines, single dose, no adjuvents, no pertussis or MMR. My pediatrician was completely supportive.

    And then my daughter started kindergarten and he began to pressure, claiming my daughter was behind on her vaccinations. I said she was right on time.

    Unfortunately, my husband told him i was an atheist and they would not allow me to sign the religious exemption; I was told my daughter could not return until vaccinated.

    I should say, my daughter had been tested, and she was in the 90th percentile across the board; her scored the highest in math in her grade, and was off the charts of vocabulary (behind 6th grade.) Her IQ was 159, and she was reading at a fourth grade level.

    The next thing I get in mail, is a warning that the school is going to refere me to Child “Protective” Services; I was in shock. I am a child advocate, I practiced attachment parenting, and did not spank, time out or punish my children at all.

    I brought in a certified letter from my doctor saying that that my daughter was on different vaccine schedule and he was fully behing it.

    Nonttheless, I came home one day, and there was a CPS card on my door. My husband flipped out, and said let’s just get the vaccinations; I said, I hell I will. I’ll get a lawyer.

    Without my knowledge or consent, my husband took our daughter to a different pediatrician and had her vaccinated; because she was “behind” he gave her five injections to “catch up.” The doctor said it was perfectly safe, that I was caught up in paranoied nonsense, and gave her literature explaining all the studies and not one shred of evidence to prove vaccines caused damage.

    When my husband brought her home, she seemed to be in shock, but she said nothing; neighter did my husband. He suggested she maybe wasn’t feeling well. For four days my energetic, gregarious child sat on the couch, she didn’t talk, she didn’t hardly moved, she didn’t speak. Then, on day four in the early evening, she began to scream. And scream and scream. She screamed as if she was being stabbed.

    We rushed her to emergency. They put her on IV morphine, and did a lot of tests, but could not figure out what was wrong with her. She was sent to Stanford Children’s Hosptial, where she was knocked out and scoped. They also took biopsies and pictures.

    The pictures showed severe inflammation, blisters, ulcerations. The doctor had no explanation, but two young research doctors took us aside and said, “Has you daughter recently had vaccinations?” I said no, and then my husband said yes, and us what he had done.

    The doctors said that they have being seeing gastrointestinal autoimmune disease in many children who have been vaccinated; they wanted our permission to take additional biopsies; I said yes, my husband said no.

    When the older doctor who was attending her heard about the vaccinations, he became extremely defensive, denying the connection and claiming these things just happened.

    And it wasn’t over, yet. Our daughter began a rapid neurological regression. This girl who had never had an “accident” had been so easy to potty train, began to wet the bed, wet at school, to vomit, and to struggle in the bathroom. Her reading skills fell of until she could not read at all. And she knew something was happening to her, one day she suddenly cried out mommy! mommy! help me! there’s something in my head! It won’t let me think!

    Our daughter fell from the the top to the bottom of the class, she flunked first grade and is now in “special ed.” Her healthy body is also ruined, bloated from an digestive tract that no longer functions properly.

    I have had intensive training for my daughter twenty extra hours a week, I have been to countless doctors, all mocking me when I mention the vaccines,

    My daughter is not what she was, she will never be what she would have been, and nobody has paid. Indeed, the insurance pays for nothing, and letters I have written to agencies are ignored, or I recieve a note saying the vaccine question is settled.

    I want to know what I can do, because this must be s\\

  27. Your site is worthless because it doesn’t contain links to stories it claims from other sites. It is totally self referential…… come now post links to the stories…

    [ED: You clearly have not read any of it. If you did you would see what is published on CHS has links to original references. We often get sad people like you who do not provide real names or even real email addresses and embark on claims which are tosh.]

  28. Vaccine of Yokohama
    I make DPT 1 year old from 3 years old in December, 1988
    I make DPT 0 years old from 1 year old in 1994
    make vaccine striking Japanese encephalitis from 3 years old as much as possible in 1994
    The influenza vaccine is a judgment of the parents

  29. You people are dangerous and the “cherry picked” info you use to support your idiotic theories are as bad as the HIV denialists. The blood is on your hands.

    [ED: In your hands clear evidence becomes “cherry-picked” and the false information repeatedly given to parents and the public by health officials is the gospel. Unfortunately for the children and adults affected, many seriously including deaths, the evidence is clear and not cherry-picked and they and their families have been “led up the garden path”. If there is blood on any hands it is not on the hands of those making the clear evidence available for all to see.]

  30. Congratulations to all those involved in supporting John Walker-Smith over the last few years.

    His appeal has been won and he has been personally and professionally vindicated for the excellent , honest and diligent work he performed.


    “An eminent doctor has won his High Court battle against being struck off over the MMR jab controversy.

    Professor John Walker-Smith appealed against the General Medical Council’s (GMC) determination that he was guilty of serious professional misconduct.

    His fight for his reputation was supported by the parents of many children with autism and bowel disease seen by him at the Royal Free Hospital, north London, up to his retirement in 2001.

    Mr Justice Mitting, sitting at London’s High Court, ruled the GMC decision “cannot stand”.

    He quashed the finding of professional misconduct and the striking-off.

    Calling for changes in the way GMC fitness to practise panel hearings are conducted in the future, the judge said of the flawed handling of Prof Walker-Smith’s case: “It would be a misfortune if this were to happen again.”

    Prof Walker-Smith left court with members of his family, saying: “I am extremely pleased with the outcome of my appeal.

    “There has been a great burden on me and my family since the allegations were first made in 2004 and throughout the hearing that ran from 2007 to 2010. I am relieved that this matter is now over.”

    Thanking his friends and supporters, including his own family and many parents and former patients, he added: “I will never forget all the support I have received and I am truly grateful for it. I hope now to enjoy my retirement with my family.”

    In a written ruling, the judge made it clear the judgment was the end of the case, and the GMC did not intend to appeal.”

  31. What is the connection between bowel/gastrointestinal disease and autism? And why is ADHD and axiety attacks also co-morbid? What causes the bloating in a formally normal, healthy child who is damgaged by vaccines?

    I have asked these questions fo my daughter’s doctors and they can give me no answers.

    How long are we going to take healthy children in for a well check, get vaccinations–these were for kindergarten–and watch a catastrophic gasstrointestinal and neurological decline?

    other parents of victims, please feel free to emal me; thiese needs to be stopped!

  32. If you want to start to read up on some factors contributing to bowel issues Autism and ADHD I have a simple article on this that I authored. Check out page 22 in NJ Natural Awakenings Aug. 2010
    This applies to Autism, ADHD, Eczema and others.

  33. Hi, If you would like to read up on some contributing factors for Bowel issues, Autism and ADHD I have authored a simple , easy to read, easy to try remedy. I hope this helps. It will be in my upcoming book “Recovering Autism ADHD and Special Needs,”which can be seen on youtube. Take care.

  34. Wow this information is so incredible! After seeing the data how could anyone disagree that vaccines are unnecessary and not responsible for the gradual decrease in childhood diseases? It’s obvious that improvements in sanitation and hygiene were responsible for the decrease in disease. So why after seeing and knowing the facts… why are the vaccines still being administered?

  35. It gets worse. It is because we have vaccines that no effective treatments have been developed for measles and these other childhood diseases so millions of third world children still die despite vaccination.

  36. Where can I find the latest update on Dr. Wakefield’s case against Brian Deere and Dr. Fiona Godlee? What is the GMC’s involvement in this? Are they also being sued?

  37. Anyone who actually understands science and medicine would be appalled and saddened by this website. Wakefield’s wretched excuse for research has caused more harm than we can even calculate, and this website is only adding to it. When you are the lone voice against an army of scientific experts you should probably stop and realize that you may be doing a lot more than trying to push an alternative thought. You may actually be harming children.

    Where are your articles about the effects of the rising rates of diseases such as measles and pertussis? Where are your pictures of children with mumps, polio deformities or rubella rashes? If you want to appear scientific, you should at least post both sides of a case. This whole website is an embarrassing mess of non-truths and conspiracy.

  38. is there any article on tips of how to live in a community of unvaccined and vaccined children?? For example how to deal with one of the kids getting whooping cough or one of the other infections…

  39. Travis if you are looking for science this is the best website to be on! Mortality statistics tell the whole truth. Can’t you see how disease rates were dropping long before mass vaccination? No offense, but It’s so obvious even a monkey can understand it. Disease rates dropped due to improvements in sanitation, hygiene, and nutrition.

    Vaccines seem like a good idea, but the fact remains that they do not work. Another good example are the people in impoverished countries who are receiving vaccinations but disease rates are still rising. Also, if you just think about it logically Travis, how did the human race ever survive for thousands of years without vaccines? Disease rates weren’t ever a problem until populations increased and most people had poor sanitation, hygiene, and nutrition.

    The only dangerous and harmful thing you should be concerned about are vaccines themselves. They seem harmless, however Autism rates are soaring higher then ever, which is congruent with higher vaccination rates. Vaccines are the biggest medial travesty in the modern world. A lot of scientist are even saying vaccines are leading to cancer; especially since cancer is a dysfunction of the immune system. So instead of strengthening our immune system, vaccines are making it weak and causing permanent genetic damage.

    My last point Travis is that since you want science to be your guiding light, please try to find just one double blinded clinically controlled trial that proves vaccine effectiveness and efficacy. You will not be successful because there are no such studies.

    You are fighting for the wrong side Travis. Unfortunately Big Pharma makes money on people getting sick. So do you really think they care if their vaccine drug is doing more harm then good?

  40. The internet is a wonderful thing, but the weight I give to anything I read on the web is based on factors of ‘credibility’.
    If I read about a wonderful new pain killer and it is a registered user on mums net who has several verifiable posts, then I will give the opinion more weight than if it is a quote on a pharma companies website.

    I have searched this site ( and read a great deal of information, but how much weight (or credibility) do I give it? It is located on a popular blog service website and I cannot find out who is responsible for it, how it is funded or how fairly it is edited.
    If I am to take what is said on this site seriously, and not continue to push for my children (Now aged 9 and 10) to be vaccinated, then I need to know a lot more about how this site is run and funded. Until I know these things then I will remain as sceptical of this site as I am of large corporations and politicians.

    I look forward to some transparency in any replies.

  41. Yeah…what he said^ I would file this site under the same “conspiracy theorist” category as those kooks who will have you believe that the terrorist attacks of 9/11 were planned by some faction of the US Govt itself. The world is filled with kooks and you are just one of them until you can give us more info on yourself.

    [ED: No James. The world is full of trolls. Either you are delusional and suffering from “conspiracy theoritis” or you are following the approach propounded in the remarks attributed to Joseph Goebbels, minister of propaganda of the III Reich, states: “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it….” or that attributed to Vladimir Lenin: “A lie told often enough becomes truth”.

    In contrast on CHS we endeavour to provide source references from the original sources.]

  42. The 10th Keele Conference for aluminum toxicity will be held in England in February 2013. In this group of Scientist Chris Exley put together, we hear first hand how the aluminum adjuvant in the Vaccines play a non beneficial role in humans. The difficultly is to find any tests on aluminum sulphates in vaccines and the settling that can occur during production. A recent study sampling of aluminum in children showed a wide variation of test sample between US lab’s. So if children are given package vaccines with aluminum sulphates, there does not exist standards nor the parameters for protecting children from excessive aluminum, nor does the medical field understand and use”chelation” if and when this occurs. Testing the spinal fluids before and after a package Vaccine will give the information.

  43. Pathetic that you are still promoting such garbage. The vaccine/autism claims have been totally discredited yet you keep the stories up here spreading fear and stopping people vaccinate thereby spreading terrible diseases.

    [ED: We notice you post this comment on the Contact page and not on any page which cites original sources by public health officials and others confirming vaccines do indeed cause autistic conditions. Sound referenced sourced information.

    Try this one:

    Vaccination Causes Autism – Say US Government & Merck’s Director of Vaccines]

  44. Hi, I find it hard to believe the information here given that we have no idea who is behind this blog. Why don’t you openly publish your background and contact information, so we can judge by ourselves of the credibility of what you are affirming?

    [ED: not a problem just carry on not believing it including anything supported by source references. Fine by us.]

  45. i agree with previous comment. i am currently trying to research the dangers (if any) of having travel vaccinations and whilst this site is rich in opinion, it appaling lacks referencable data.

    to the undisclosed publishers of this site:
    if you make even one comment which offers an opionion, you should refernce the study or unfo you have used to bae this opinion on.

    [ED: sorry to see you have literacy difficulties with your written English. You also appear to have literacy difficulties with reading English.]

  46. The link “” does not work. Can it be recovered please?

  47. Big Pharma and Big Media are both owned by “The Pilgrims Society.” This nearly unknown organization is the source of these problems, and many of them are involved in population control/reduction fronts.


    What has vaccines done to your kids Has cps social services taken your children after vaccine damages ? PRO AND ANTI VACCINE’S PLEASE TUNE IN.

    CALL USA 3476770812
    CALL UK 01444 390270

    UK 3PM

    AUSTRALIA 11/12PM.

  49. Hi,
    I have a huge issue regarding immunisations being forced on my 2 year old daughter. The mother and I made an informed decision not to vaccinate our daughter at birth, however we did immunise her through homeopathic methods. Since then we have seperated and we are currently going through the court system for parenting orders. The issue is that the mother is now wanting to enrol our daughter into child care and has changed her mind about vaccinations for this reason. I have explained to her about the exemption form but she is now saying that she still wants to vaccinate. So because we have equal parenting responsibilities, but cant agree on the matter, the decision is now up to the court to decide. This is where the problem is, the judge will decide based on scientific evidence and i have heard of previous matters where the judge has ordered vaccinations under these circumstances. So I am extremely dissadvantaged here.
    My question is can you please provide me with any documents or studies of a scientific nature that you think the judge would consider as scientific evidence. I need to prove risks and also the effectiveness of homeopathic immunisations. I need to do everything i can to protect my daughter from this. Please help.
    Luke OBrien

    Sent from my iPhone

  50. The links to the pdf transcripts of your trial with the GMC are broken so I can’t download anything. It is possible someone is hacking your site.

    [ED: Thank you for notifying us of the problem of broken links to the transcripts.

    The links are now repaired. You can download and read all the transcripts.]

  51. Love your blog. We are like minded. Check me out:

    fighting medical tyranny right now in California. It’s a friggin war. Keep us in your thoughts.

    lori gregory

    There are identified 234 types of human papillomavirus (HPV); they are divided in low and high risk; the high risk factor HPV are suspicious to originate the uterine cervical carcinoma (UCC); the low risk the mayority, produce benigns lesions; to day exist world collective psicosis about the HPV by the full advertising to the manufacturer to introduce the vaccine against the HPV in the market.
    There are not researchers; stadistic, epidemiologc, citologic, histologic, colposcopic and clinic to demostrate that this vaccine prevent the pollution with HPV nor the HPV produce the cervical cancer
    HPV infection not only is adquired for the coitus; we are contaminated since after born, are widespread in the world; they life in the environment and blood for reduced time; they are ubiquitous; by immunology are determined that have the affinity by our skin and the mucous membrane of the genital, upper respiratory and digestive tracts; anus, of the mouth, gum, lips, in the amniotic fluid, ruber glove, biopsy forceps, specula, underwear, towels, on the floor, the toilet seat, gyms, lockers rooms of swimming in general in the fomites;: are considered as commensals; the domestic and wild animals too are contaminated.
    In average have the viruses 3% to 93% of the men; between 23-26 years of women have the more high frequency and 40% of children have this virus and the 10% of women without sex have the HPV; the pregnants of the first quarter 40%, of the third quarter 60% and in the postpartum 17% have the HPV. Not all person in the world are contaminated;.in average 10% of persons that are leving in development countries and 15% in underdevelpment are polluted with this viruses; they lack to the cellular structure; they have not the proper metabolism; they request a cell to life, is the parasitic of the cell; they are considered the basic structure of life.The frequency and types of the HPV vary according to the region, geography, age, cultural, social, economic and religious factors; the HPV do not distribuited to iqual in the world; in USA: the more frequecy is PVH 16 , Africa HPV 45 , Central and South America PVH 39-59, Canada HPV 31, Spain HPVs 6-16-51- 53: The HPV is increased in the second time of the menstrual cycles and in women who use hormonal anticonception and decrease in the first time of the cycles and do not use hormonal anticonception; the proportion of the HPV too is diferent over the world: Africa Subsahariana 24%, east of Europe 21.4% , Latin America 16.1%, Thailand 8%, New Mexico both sexo 9%, white no hispanic 13.7% , hispanic 9.7% and natives 6.6% , Argentina 16.6% , South Corea 10.4% and so on; a metanalysis in women with normal PAP 11.7%.The HPV life in the cervix of the uterine without produced disturbance: are latent, subclinical in minority case as warts, condylomata flat or inverted ; The HPV are capricious, ubiquitous and enigmatics, appears and disappears from the body of the person, the highest incidence are in women aged 20 to 26 years disappear with the age, may persist throughout life without causing any disturbance, in 80% of women who have HPV in your cervix disappear before the twelve months, by action of the immune system.
    There are not any investigation that scienrtifically proof that the HPV cause the uterine cervical carcinoma (UCC) it is only suspicious. In the development of the UCC are implicate others cofactors being the first and foremost the sexual act; the coitus is the factor scientifically demostrated that produce the UCC; Mix in 130, 000 nuns do not found not any UCC, followed by fasctor suspísous: tobacco, alcohol, HPV, herpes simplex virus 2, age of first intercourse, number of partners, cofactor man, economic factors, more frequent in women of low economic status , multiparity, circumcision, immune system disorders, hormonal contraception, environment and others.
    In 1974 zur Hausen hypothesized that HPV was the agent that cause the UCC and other researchers reported the same idea, but HPV does not fulfill the five Koch’s postulates, which is accepted as dogma in the scientific medical to be considered as the cause of cervical cancer; the HPV in UCC are found by immunological methods in only 90%, that can consider as that the HPV is present or is a immunology residue; the HPV natural or native do not UCC
    The presence of HPV is not sufficient for the development the UCC, require the company of several exogenous and endogenous cofactors.
    Our understanding of the relationship of HPV with the cofactors are still poor and the role of cofactors in the development of cervical malignancy are nebulous. Scientifically can ensures that HPV does not cause cervical carcinoma and HPV vaccine does not prevent less prevents cervical carcinoma, must have further research on the HPV and other cofactors.
    Dr. Godfrey Arauzo
    Huancayo PERU
    E mail: godo.ara @

  53. This is all trash, I hate everyone who wrote an article on this site, commented something serious, or actually believes anything posted on this website. The only reason I am here is because I’m using UNICEF as an example for a humanitarian effort speech and I was deep in Google archives. I hate all of you. All I want to say.

    [ED: Thanks for stopping by. Appreciate it. Glad to know what you think. Its probably better than being ignored.]

  54. Has a study been done to compare children with autism that have been vaccinated versus those who have not? Very curious.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: