MMR vaccine manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline has appointed to its Board the head of News International James Murdoch. Murdoch is also boss of The Sunday Times, London, England publisher of stories by freelance journalist Brian Deer to discredit research into the link between MMR vaccine and autism in the US and UK [James Murdoch joins Glaxo board – Andrew Jack and Ben Fenton Financial Times 2 February 2009].
Murdoch will serve as a member of GSK’s corporate responsibility committee, where he will help to review “external issues that might have the potential for serious impact upon the group’s business and reputation“:[James Murdoch takes GlaxoSmithKline role – Chris Tryhorn The Guardian Monday 2 February 2009.
Some wags have now dubbed the newspaper “The Sunday Glaxo“.
James Murdoch took up his appointment alongside Sir Crispin Davis the CEO of The Lancet medical journal’s owners. Sir Crispin is brother of Judge Nigel Davis whose English High Court judgement in February 2004 saw the end of British children’s MMR vaccine injury claims [MMR Judge Faces Probe Over Brother’s Links to Vaccine Firm – Evening Standard, London 9 May 2007].
The outcome of an investigation by the Office for Judicial Complaints found no impropriety and resulted in no action taken regarding the relationship between Judge Davis and his brother Crispin Davis’ GlaxoSmithKline board position. A statement issued on Judge Davis’ behalf to The Telegraph newspaper legal correspondent, Joshua Rosenberg stated that “the possibility of any conflict of interest had not occurred to him“. Sir Crispin Davis received a knighthood in June 2004.
Recent statements by UK Sunday Times’ journalist Brian Deer shows he helped the US Department of Justice present the US Court of Federal Claims on a number of occasions with last-minute documents to defeat the prospects for the US children’s claims [Full quote below]. The production of last-minute evidence is a litigation tactic which can prejudice the Court’s view and can leave an opponent with little time to counter it. The Federal Court has previously upheld claims of US children developing autistic symptoms from vaccines including the MMR vaccine: [AUTISM – US Court Decisions and Other Recent Developments – It’s Not Just MMR]
A key potential rebuttal witness, Dr Andrew Wakefield could not come forward because of the journalist’s long-running personal campaign to discredit research into the link between the MMR vaccine and autism. The prospects for the US children were also already harmed by the journalist’s now seemingly inadequately researched reports published internationally since 2003 in the UK Sunday Times which have hindered research and are believed to have had a deterrent effect on other experts coming forward.
Dr Andrew Wakefield, the British gastroenterologist formerly of The Royal Free Hospital, London who first raised the alarm over a possible MMR vaccine-autism link has been silenced during the continuing controversial and long-running UK legal proceedings before the UK General Medical Council. The journalist Brian Deer is currently embroiled in controversy over breaches of journalistic ethics and conflicts of interest for reporting on legal proceedings he instigated as the original complainant.
Brian Deer’s Sunday Times’ stories on the issue appear to have been based on his unqualified personal opinions absent expert advice, comment or review according to his own claims [Full quotes below]. Freelance journalist Brian Deer qualified from Warwick University England with a Batchelor of Arts degree in philosophy and has no medical or scientific qualifications.
The GMC proceedings against Dr Wakefield arise from allegations made by the journalist over 1997 clinical investigations by a team of 13 medical specialists at The Royal Free Hospital London into children with autism and serious bowel conditions claimed linked to the MMR vaccine following a medical paper Dr Wakefield authored with the 12 other medical experts in The Lancet. The Lancet’s editor Dr Richard Horton claimed to regret publishing the paper after Brian Deer’s February 2004 articles in The Sunday Times. No parents of autistic children lodged the complaints. Journalist Brian Deer was also a defendant in litigation with Dr Wakefield.
The Sunday Times freelancer published now shown-to-be false allegations [8th February] that Dr Andrew Wakefield “fixed data” to show a link between MMR vaccine, autism and serious bowel disorders in children [Sunday Times Journalist Made Up Wakefield MMR Data Fixing Allegation – 0 – Sunday Times Journalist Admits Wakefield MMR “Data Fixing” Allegation Is Unqualified Speculation – 0 – Sunday Times’ London Editor Must Quit Over False “Wakefield MMR Data Fixing” Story].
UK journalist and political commentator Melanie Phillips wrote [Monday, 16th February 2009 [ A deer in the headlights The Spectator]:-
Last week there was a big vaccine damage judgement in the US – the ‘Cedillo’ case – in which the court said the Wakefield theory about MMR was out to lunch in la-la land.
If his [Deer’s] boast is true, it would seem that the US court — whose ruling looks pretty thin to me — arrived at its conclusion based on Deer’s allegations. In other words, two major quasi-legal hearings relating to Andrew Wakefield’s theory, one of which is being reported by Deer, have depended significantly or wholly upon a journalist’s own allegations.
This is what Deer posted on the Left Brain Right Brain website in the wake of that case:
“….. I’m also very proud that ….. the US government sought my help in mounting its case in Cedillo, copiously borrowing pages of evidence from my website and displaying some in court. I was surprised by this…….. on a number of occasions I would come home, find an email from the department of justice asking me for a document, and see that the next day it was being run in court. …….. I recall supplying a key document on the O’Leary lab business, which the DoJ didn’t seem to know about just weeks before the hearing”
Freelance journalist Brian Deer who qualified from Warwick University England with a BA in philosophy confirmed the “Data Fixing” article was based solely on his own opinions stating in a blog on which he has routinely posted [Brian Deer on February 20th, 2009 22:15:38]:-
I wouldn’t want folk to lose sight of my landmark report of the weekend before last: I believe the first time ever that a journalist has gone behind the words on the page of a medical research paper, and compared its claims with original case data.
The issues go much wider than just MMR: with my findings raising the question of why we give such weight to what we read in the journals.
The work of journalists is always eventually open the scrutiny [sic]. ….. if what I published was untrue, I would get caught out eventually. ……
I was told by a very senior medical journal editor the other day that a guy at the New York Times has for years been trying to accomplish something similar with other papers, but, to my knowledge, I’m the first ever to do it.
Perhaps this is immodest of me, but I’m very proud of this accomplishment, which will always be a highlight of my professional career.
The Sunday Times journalist then goes on to confirm he will be using confidential medical details from children’s records to publish more reports:-
I’ve got some great tables comparing the Lancet paper with the children’s actual histories and diagnoses. Eventually I will publish them
The DoJ was sending out just before the US Cedillo decision the now shown-to-be-falsely-headlined article in The Sunday Times of London by journalist Brian Deer, attacking the basis for the US children’s claims and published the Sunday before the Court decisions: Sunday Times Journalist Made Up Wakefield MMR Data Fixing Allegation 11 Feb 09 and Sunday Times – Sinks To New Low With Yet More MMR Junk Journalism 8 Feb 09].
These events are closely similar to the UK in 2004. Just before a crucial English Court decision throwing out UK children’s legal aid funding for claims for the same injuries the same journalist published similar articles again in The Sunday Times London unusually again substantially based on the journalist’s own unqualified medical opinions. It was later discovered the Judge in the UK case was the brother of a director of MMR vaccine manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline: British Government & Establishment’s Efforts to Deny Compensation to MMR Vaccine Child Victims
No other journalist has been writing the same kinds of stories.
The companion article to the “Data Fixing” story was amended online [18 Feb] with a statement “This article is the subject of a legal complaint” [Hidden records show MMR truth Brian Deer, The Sunday Times – February 8, 2009].
Whilst Mr James Murdoch is not reported to have involvement in editorial decisions at The Sunday Times, the recent appointment to the MMR vaccine manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline’s Board may give rise to public concern over the close links between key players in MMR litigation in the US and UK and the support at The Sunday Times for the campaigning activities of journalist Brian Deer. Similarly, there is no suggestion of any direct, indirect or other impropriety arising from the relationships noted in this article, the public is entitled to ask questions such as “what medical journal editor, newspaper editor or journalist is going to write unfavourable stories about GlaxoSmithKline and not write favourable stories when his boss in on Glaxo’s board. How will the existence of such relationships influence the thinking and actions of subordinates and others without being asked? How can this healthy and in the public interest?“
- Sunday Times – Sinks To New Low With Yet More MMR Junk Journalism;
- Sunday Times’ London Editor Must Quit Over False “Wakefield MMR Data Fixing” Story;
- US Federal Court, US Justice Dept & The Sunday Times – More Questions Than Answers;
- Sunday Times Journalist Challenged Over Role in US MMR Cases
John Fryer, on February 26th, 2009 at 11:01 am Said:
This story is like a headless chicken with strong arms and weak legs.
Wakefield at the top of the body is the neck. The US and UK MMR cases are legs.
The Davis brothers at the bottom of the body with connections to GSK and the legal and power base systems of the world. GSK representing industry and Murdoch as powerful people.
The strong arm tactics of the science journals as shown by the Verstraeten study much altered data and the once reputed Times or journal of the people with utterances from Deer people.
At present the neck is being wrung.
But this is some chicken!
And there seems to be no head on this chicken.
Is that because the vaccines complete with mercury have taken out the head?
I mean I wonder how you put 130 000 000 PPT thimerosal in babies vaccines with 1 000 000 PPT methyl mercury impurity and say its harmless when in 2009 it requires food taken off our shelves with more than 20 PPT mercury in them.
I wonder really why one baby in three never gets born in the UK and why thousands of babies die coincidentally after vaccines.
All would be fine perhaps if it was death or glory.
Pity that millions survive with some brains but not enough to be considered as having a high IQ.
I wonder if homo sapiens one day may realise once a toxic chemical always a toxic chemical.
I hope so.
[ED: What new revelations will we see in The Sunday Glaxo in future.
Last time around GlaxoSmithKline hired the CEO of The Lancet medical journal’s owners and we got Brian Deer’s stories in The Sunday Glaxo just over 6 months later.
This time they hire the boss of The Sunday Glaxo and we get Brian Deer’s stories in The Sunday Glaxo six days later ……..
…………. and – without any medical expert backing Brian Deer up – all we get is Brian Deer the expert – the expert in gastroenterology, in autism, in neurology, in psychology, in psychiatry, in histopathology and more. But that did not stop The Sunday Glaxo publishing – no siree Bob, not for a second. Extra! Extra! read all about it in The Sunday Glaxo!]
mark, on February 27th, 2009 at 4:52 pm Said:
take a look at the EDM to silence the media.
keep up the good work
[ED: Take a look at The Health Protection (Vaccination) Regulations 2009 and especially
2. Obligation on the Secretary of State to ensure implementation of JCVI recommendations
The regulations were laid before Parliament 21 Jan 09 and come into force 1st April. If the Secretary of State is obliged to do what the JCVI tell him, that is a big change and may also not be lawful if it has the effect of subordinating the power of the Secretary to an external body. That is also an external body which was subordinate to the Secretary of State and is a “volutary” advisory body – and which has a track record of behaving irresponsibly on vaccination issues.
Professor Hugh Pennington and a US representative discussed compulsory vaccination on BBC Radio 4 on . You can listen again
Should measles vaccination be compulsory? 18 Feb 2009
Listen to this item
Could a “no jab, no school” rule be the solution to increasing infection rates?
To listen to this here is some better software than BBC’s RealPlayer. Real Alternative will allow you to play RealMedia files
without having to install RealPlayer/RealOne Player:-
Download Real Alternative
[…] further the Child Health Safety blog. Tags: Andrew Wakefield, Brian Deer, Dr. Wakefield, GlaxoSmithKline, GSK, House of Commons […]
[…] the whole situation when she brought this article that appeared in the Feb 25, 2009 blog post on Child Health Safety to my […]