[See end for "What YOU Can Do"]
Dawn Primarolo as UK Government Health Minister misled Parliament in a written answer to Conservative MP Mark Pritchard that Bailey Banks’ successful damages claim in the US Federal Court for an autistic condition caused by the MMR vaccine was “non autistic”, stating Bailey had a “non-autistic development delay”.
Now, health minister Mike O’Brien has agreed in a letter to an MP that the ruling referred to a diagnosis of an Autistic Spectrum Disorder. “Pervasive Developmental Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified” is a category of Autistic Spectrum Disorders which does not fall into any other autism category”. There is no misunderstanding amongst experts of what it means. The paediatrician advising the court, Dr Lopez, decided against a diagnosis of autism not because Bailey Banks did not have autistic symptoms but because his condition was vaccine induced.
The designation “Pervasive Developmental Disorder” is the US diagnostic term for “Autistic Spectrum Disorder” used in the rest of the world. “Pervasive Developmental Disorder” is also the term used by The Royal Free Hospital researchers in their 1998 Lancet study which first suggested a possible link between the MMR vaccine and autistic conditions. Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children Lancet 1998; 351: 637-41
Primarolo told Parliament in April when a health minister:
In 2007 the United States Court of Federal Claims made a ruling in favour of compensation to the father of Bailey Banks for his non-autistic developmental delay as a result of Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis (ADEM) following receipt of measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine. ADEM is an extremely rare condition that has been reported after rabies, diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis, smallpox, MMR, Japanese B encephalitis, pertussis, influenza and hepatitis B vaccines. The Bailey Banks case has no implications for MMR vaccine policy. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmhansrd/cm090318/text/90318w0021.htm#090318108002328
Special Master Abell’s judgement in the Bailey Banks case states unequivocally (p.27):
Furthermore, Bailey’s ADEM was severe enough to cause lasting, residual damage, and retarded his developmental progress, which fits under the generalized heading of Pervasive Developmental Delay, or PDD. The Court found that Bailey would not have suffered this delay but for the administration of the MMR vaccine, and that this chain of causation was not too remote, but was rather a proximate sequence of cause and effect leading inexorably from vaccination to Pervasive Developmental Delay. .
Master Abell explained (p.7):
Moving on to the alternative hypothesis/diagnosis of autism, Dr. Lopez distinguishes autism as a more generalized condition without a known etiology, and contrasted it to Bailey’s condition, which he says is clearly attributable to demyelination based on neuroimaging evidence. Tr. at 41-42. Dr. Lopez also differentiated Bailey’s condition from autism, because Bailey has been affected in more than one developmental skill area; he clarified by stating that Bailey has “induced pervasive developmental delay…due to ADEM.” Tr. at 32. He noted that the conflation of designations resulted from a medical convention created for the sake of explanation to laymen, but that the two are not properly interchangeable, but actually quite distinct. Id. Speaking more directly, Dr. Lopez stated that “Bailey does not have autism because he has a reason for his deficits.” Tr. at 42. http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/BANKS_CASE.pdf
Now in a letter to an MP, health minister Mike O’Brien agrees that the term ‘PDD’ or ‘PDD-NOS’ (Pervasive Development Delay-Not Otherwise Specified) was that used by the court:
I understand that Mr X… believes that the answer should have referred to pervasive development disorder rather than non-autistic development delay. Relevant information is given on page 2 of the Bailey Banks ruling available at www.uscfc.uscourts.gov by searching for ‘Bailey Banks’. This specifies the ruling refers to ‘Pervasive Development Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified’ in which full features of autism are not identified’.
O’Brien has, therefore, conceded that there were features of autism, which undermines Dawn Primarolo’s claim that Bailey Banks had a ‘non-autistic development delay’: Bailey would undoubtedly be classified as having an Autistic Spectrum Disorder in the UK, even if he did not have “the full features of autism”, or was “atypical” as in many cases, and/or had additional learning difficulties (not usually grounds for withholding an autism diagnosis). Governments, heath officials and vaccine manufacturers are evading responsibility by exploiting confused terminology for a range of developmental problems, nearly all of which are non-specific diagnoses.
When the Banks decision came to light earlier this year Robert F Kennedy Jr, writing in Huffington Post commented that vaccine court cases were more likely to be awarded if the word “autism” did not appear as consequential on brain-damage from encephalopathy:
Medical records associated with these proceedings clearly tell the tale. In perhaps hundreds of these cases, the children have all the classic symptoms of regressive autism; following vaccination a perfectly healthy child experiences high fever, seizures, and other illnesses, then gradually, over about three months, loses language, the ability to make eye contact, becomes “over-focused” and engages in stereotypical head banging and screaming and then suffers developmental delays characteristic of autism. Many of these children had received the autism diagnosis. Yet the radioactive word “autism” appears nowhere in the decision. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-f-kennedy-jr-and-david-kirby/vaccine-court-autism-deba_b_169673.html
The problems are compounded in the UK by the policy of not monitoring, recording or investigating adverse reactions to vaccines, and then citing absence of data as evidence of safety. National Health Service advice is to ignore reactions to MMR vaccine, and to come back for repeat doses (against the fundamental medical ethics and even manufacturers’ instructions).
From an NHS website:
Q:My son had a sever [sic] reaction to the first MMR jab. Does this mean that he is well protected from these diseases, or is a second dose still necessary?
A: If a child has responded to all the components of the vaccine the first time, he will not have a problem being exposed to the viruses again. It’s like any one of us who is already immune meeting someone with the disease – the infection can’t get established. If he hasn’t made protection to all three diseases after the first time, then he would still be susceptible to those natural infections, and still needs the 2nd dose. Reactions after the 2nd dose are essentially the same as after the 1st dose, but if they do occur they are even rarer. There are no new side effects after the 2nd dose that do not occur after the 1st dose. The advice is therefore that it is safe for your child to have the 2nd dose in order that he is properly protected. http://tiny.cc/7vA7g
The casual dismissal of even “severe reactions” shows that Primarolo’s claim that cases of ADEM (Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis) which led to Bailey Banks’ pervasive development delay are “extremely rare” has no foundation. The most that the UK Department of Health could truthfully state about the incidence of ADEM is that they do not know how often it occurs, and that the failure to collect data is a matter of policy. Meanwhile, scientists and officials continue to ignore over-whelming statistical evidence from Japan of the correlation between the vaccine programme and incidence of autism, collated and presented by ChildHealthSafety and Age of Autism: http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2009/06/03/japvaxautism/
http://www.ageofautism.com/2009/06/japanese-data-shows-vaccines-cause-autism.html
The failure of candour over these issues by government politicians and officials continues to obstruct public scrutiny of what is going on over MMR, other vaccines and autism. UK citizens should contact their members of parliament http://tinyurl.com/ljxtgv to complain about continuing government dissimulation over these matters.
WHAT YOU CAN DO
If you are concerned write to your political representative. Don’t complain when politicians do nothing if you do not write and keep on writing. It is their job to represent you. All our kids deserve proper science to protect their safety.
Contacting Your UK or US Political Representative
USA
UK Residents – Write To Your Politicians – Do It Now!
To email your MP, all you need to know is your MP’s name. MP’s email addresses are in the form:-
surname.initial@parliament.uk.
To find out who your MP is click on this link:-
More You Can Do
If you found this information helpful – share this page with others:-
- email the links to this page to others
- post links to this page
- on your website
- on your blog
- in comments on relevant websites and blogs
- email them to health journalists and journalists from your local newspapers, TV and radio stations – [phone them for details of email addresses or look them up on the internet]
Here is a link for you to copy and paste :-
Minister Misled Parliament Over MMR Autism Link
_______________________________
RELATED STORIES
MMR/Autism Cases Win In US Vaccine Court
MMR Causes Autism – Another Win In US Federal Court
British Minister Misled Parliament Over US MMR Autism Case
Sunday Times’ Claims “Discredited” – Wakefield’s Autism Research Verified
Japanese Data Show Vaccines Cause Autism
Autism Rates Rocket – 1 in 38 British Boys – Cambridge Study
Autism In Amish Children – 1 in 10,000
Parents Cure Autism – As Useless Docs Fail Kids
Secret British MMR Vaccine Files Forced Open By Legal Action
UK Government Hides Yet More MMR Documents
UK Government Caught Lying On Baby Hep B Vax Safety
UK Government Hands Drug Industry Control of Childhood Vaccination
Autism Not Genetic – Says Expert Professor Simon Baron Cohen
Recent US Data Shows Autism In Children Vastly Higher Than in Adults
Sunday Times Ordered ‘Remove Wakefield MMR “Data Fixing” Story’
Sunday Times’ Stories Collapse In GMC Wakefield Prosecution
There Is No “Anti-Vaccine” Movement
Vaccines Implicated in Rocketing Childhood Diabetes Rates
UK Compulsory Vaccination Imminent
World Pandemic Health News Round-Up
US Docs “Children to Die” In Flu Non-Pandemic
Amazing Larry King Live TV Coverage of Autism & Vaccines
Larry King Live – Breakthrough Coverage & More
Dr Ben Glaxacre’s “BadScience” Gets It Wrong - Again
Times’ Group Journo Costs GMC £1M – But Blames MMR Doc!
Sunday Times’ MMR Lies Nailed At Last – Editor Witherow Should Resign
Vaccines Did Not Save Us – 2 Centuries of Official Statistics
Government Risks Male Sterility As Mumps Vaccine Fails
Cambridge University Autism Expert Highlights Flaw In Reports of New Autism Paper
Can you ever cure autism? This mum believes her sons have recovered
Brian Deer’s Boss Joins MMR Manufacturer Glaxo’s Board
Sunday Times Journalist In Cedillo Vaccine Case Controversy
Sunday Times Journalist Admits Wakefield MMR Data Fixing Allegation Is Unqualified Speculation
Sunday Times’ London Editor Must Quit Over False “Wakefield MMR Data Fixing” Story
US Federal Court, US Justice Dept & The Sunday Times – More Questions Than Answers
Sunday Times Journalist Made Up Wakefield MMR Data Fixing Allegation
Sunday Times – Sinks To New Low With Yet More MMR Junk Journalism
Dr Andrew Wakefield Demolishes Ignorant US Vaccine Lobby
CDC’s New Dodgy Thimo Study – Shows Vax’ed/Un-Vax’ed Research Now Urgent
UK’s GMC, Dr Jayne Donegan’s Story, Vaccines & MMR
US Research Fraud, Tax Dollars And Italian Vaccine Mercury Study
Is Obama US Surgeon General Nominee Earnest Over Vaccines Causing Autism
Vaccination-Induced Autism, The Debate That Won’t Go Away
Lies, Damn Lies and Blog Posts
HPV Vaccine Questioned Internationally
Gardasil Victims – In Memoriam – Healthy Young Women – Aged 15 to 21
Filed under: ADHD, Aspergers, Barak Obama, Child Health Safety, Disease Statistics, Hannah Poling, John Poling, MMR, Obama, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines, autism, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court | Tagged: ADHD, Andrew Wakefield, Aspergers, autism, Barak Obama, Baron Cohen, CDC, David Kirby, fraud, genetic, genetics, Hannah Poling, immunisation, Jon Poling, Julie Gerberding, MMR, Obama, Professor Baron Cohen, Professor Simon Baron Cohen, research, research fraud, Simon Baron Cohen, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine adverse reaction, Vaccine Damage, vaccine risks, Vaccines, Wakefield

With respect to Dawn Primarolo, she will have no “opinion” on these matters but will be reflecting the line, policies or reasons of the British Government.
Also with respect to the current Prime Minister, he lost his first child in rather mysterious circumstances where of course the health service was praised for doing all they could to save the child.
Regrettably the millions of SIDS and neurological harm may well yet turn out to be health care related. Often again the health service does all it can by rushing medics to take the child away before the vaccine links are discovered. Should we praise the health service for killing and maiming our next generation?
It is sad when health professionals hide behind illness and death of “no known cause” and keep being praised for doing everything humanly possible to save lives. Sadly they would often do better by doing nothing.
No vaccines until the dozen or so that died in the trials were explained as being unvaccine related by proof rather than hope.
Charitably there are only 11 out of 12 signs that such deaths are vaccine related in such small trials.
100 years to discover anaphylaxis.
And today another 100 years later we defy anaphylaxis by statements above: If the first vaccine didn’t work the second one will…
According to Charles Richet Nobel Prize Winner this can be completed as:
… kill the child or make the child permanently neurological harmed.
Hi All.
You guys do a great job, thank you..