Here you can watch in real time as some of Dr Ben Goldacre’s BadScience Internet forum members agree together to engage across the internet in what will likely be their usual formula of personal abuse, disparagement, harassment and defamation.
They have been told to shut up on Dr Ben Goldacre’s BadScience Forum about this CHS article posted three days ago:
So having been told to shut up on Dr Ben Goldacre’s BadScience Forum, they are being told it is OK to go onto their own blogs where they will no doubt engage in Google bombing the internet about this.
Here you can see it being discussed on Dr Ben Goldacre’s BadScience forum, [subject of course to postings being deleted or posting terminated once this CHS article is posted]:
Dr Ben Goldacre’s BadScience Forum Comment Thread: ”Patient Commits Suicide After His Doctor Hounded By..”
The CHS article above is about just one suicide linked to the internet activities of some of the members of Dr Ben Goldacre’s BadScience Forum. It is not the only suicide of an individual subjected to years of relentless internet attacks by some of Dr Ben Goldacre’s BadScience Forum members.
The article exposes what Dr Ben Goldacre has been allowing on his BadScience internet forum for years – very serious organised orchestrated internet bullying, abuse, disparagement, harassment and defamation on an internet wide scale against individuals who have differing perspectives from his members and associates.
Additionally, it is clear from this and other evidence that Dr Ben Goldacre is allowing his BadScience forum to be used in this manner. He has had previous warnings which are documented.
Harassment whether on the internet or elsewhere is apparently illegal and can attract stiff penalties following laws introduced to the UK to counter serious problems of stalking and harassment of celebrities and private individuals. And this clearly has the look of the usual orchestrated harassment by agreement which under wholly separate legal provisions CHS understands can also be unlawful and attract stiff penalties.
Or should Dr Goldacre be exempt from acting responsibly or above the law?
The BadScience Forum webpage linked to above keeps changing and some comments have been removed already and some are still being added.
In case of further deletions here is an exchange showing they have been told to shut up:
jdc wrote:soveda wrote:Moderator note:
Please be very careful in discussing this not to stray into anything that will be problematic, thank you.
Further to this: I was a bit worried we hadn’t been quite careful enough, so I’ve quarantined a couple of posts. I might be being overcautious. I’ll ask the other mods to take a look at teh quarantined posts.
I apologise for inadvertently posting about this. I didn’t realise what was going on (but I have since received PMs from three people explaining the situation).
And here is why they are being told to shut up on Dr Ben Goldacre’s BadScience Forum:
#19 by teacake » Sat Jan 04, 2014 2:34 pmandysnat wrote:It has nothing to do with legal, and plenty to do with keeping the forum.Thanks.
This. Anybody feel free to PM me for discussion of the background to this situation.
Here is a post encouraging Dr Ben Goldacre’s BadScience Forum members to blog about these matters on their own blogs across the internet instead of on Dr Goldacre’s BadScience forum:
#14 by duck » Sat Jan 04, 2014 1:25 pmAs ever, we thoroughly encourage people to write about this on their own blogs.
And another here:
#16 by ThermalTurnip » Sat Jan 04, 2014 1:46 pmBackstep wrote:Dear mods, I love you all dearly, but hows about you don’t encourage us to p.ssy foot around this topic? As long as comments are legal is there any thing else we need to take into account?
#17 by teacake » Sat Jan 04, 2014 2:04 pmBackstep wrote:As long as comments are legal is there any thing else we need to take into account?
Yes, there is. The last time this came up it was almost the end of this forum. Personally, I like it here, and I don’t want it to become more trouble to the curly-haired one than it’s worth.
I think we should take the advice previously given, and repeated by duck, that if we want to address the issues raised we should take it to our own blogs.
Filed under: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Child Health Safety, MMR, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines | Tagged: ADHD, Anti-vaccine Safety, Aspergers, autism, Bad Science, Bad Science Forum, badscience.net, Ben Goldacre, Cervarix, Dr Ben Goldacre, Gardasil, government, Health, HPV, HPV vaccine, medicine, mercury, MMR, politics, science, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines |