Smallpox Eradication – One of History’s Biggest Lies & How Vaccination Did Not Eradicate Smallpox

You know about how individuals gain control of the power of the State and then abuse that power like former US President George “Dubya” Bush?  “Dubya” started a war in Iraq which was highly profitable for some US businesses.  He achieved this by claiming Iraq had a nuclear weapons programme which was a serious world security threat when Iraq did not and when it had already been bombed into oblivion by the war his Dad George Bush Snr waged on Iraq in 1992: Valerie Plame Wilson: the housewife CIA spy who was ‘fair game’ for Bush UK The Telegraph By Chrissy Iley 15 Feb 2011. 

Remember how Bush was supported by UK Premier Tony Blair who helped by persuading the British Parliament to join the US with faked “intelligence” of Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction which did not exist but which Blair claimed could be deployed within 40 minutes and posed a serious security threat?

If you remember that then you will know how these kinds of people manipulate the media.  Notice how they persuade us we are in imminent danger of some threat or other and that they can save us all if we trust them?

This trickery is not new.  It had been used for well over a century with smallpox.  The myth continues to this day.

On CHS we wrote previously about how unscientific the claim is that smallpox was eradicated by vaccination when that frankly is nonsense scientifically.  The demise of the disease came about as a result of the interaction of three completely different factors: isolation, attenuation and improved living conditions, particularly nutrition and sanitation. The effect cannot be attributable to the smallpox vaccine – any vaccine which takes over 100 years to work ipso facto proves itself not to have:

Small Pox – Big Lie – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication

There was a nasty disease called smallpox and it did kill people long ago.

This was especially the case when the poor moved to the cities during the industrial revolution looking for work and choked them in overcrowded unsanitary slums ripe for breeding and spreading disease: London’s first park built after rich feared disease spread from slums UK The Independent By Andy McSmith Friday 07 November 2008;  Hygiene History in the Industrialized World.

The middle and upper classes needed to be reassured the State would keep them safe from the threat of disease.  The majority of the population of entire countries were persuaded their States could achieve this by ensuring the then truly “great unwashed” masses would be vaccinated and the disease controlled.  The trouble was this was a myth but the people wanted to believe and were persuaded. 

Smallpox vaccination did not work and sometimes killed as many or more than the disease itself whilst many of the “vaccinated” still contracted the disease: Smallpox Mortality, UK, USA, Sweden.

Now you can read a relatively short but well-referenced history of the myth of vaccination and the myth of its role in the eradication of smallpox:

Online Version – Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD – August 27, 2013

PDF file downloadVaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD – August 27, 2013

SMALLPOX MORTALITY-UK, USA & SWEDEN

In the graphs below notice the large numbers of deaths caused by the smallpox vaccine itself.  By 1901 in the UK, more people died from the smallpox vaccination than from smallpox itself.  The severity of the disease dimished with improved living standards and was not vanquished by vaccination, as the medical “consensus” view tells us. Any vaccine which takes 100 years to “work” did not.  On any scientific analysis of the history and data, crediting smallpox vaccine for the decline in smallpox appears misplaced.

When during 1880-1908 the City of Leicester in England stopped vaccination compared to the rest of the UK and elsewhere, its survival rates soared and smallpox death rates plummeted [see table below].  Leicester’s approach also cost far less.

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

 uk-vacc-deaths-1875-1922

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

uk-vacc-deaths-1906-1922

Extracts from “LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination” By J.T. Biggs J.P.

[Download Entire Book as .pdf 43 Mb  – Or Read Online]

TABLE 21

SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with “unprotected” Leicester – 1860 to 1908.

Name. Period. Small-Pox.  Cases Small-Pox. Deaths. Fatality-rate per cent. of Cases
Japan 1886-1908 288,779 77,415 26.8
British Army (United Kingdom) 1860-1908 1,355 96 7.1
British Army (India) 1860-1908 2,753 307 11.1
British Army (Colonies) 1860-1908 934 82 8.8
Royal Navy 1860-1908 2,909 234 8.0
Grand Totals and case fatality rate per cent, over all 296,730 78,134 26.3
Leicester (since giving up vaccination) 1880-1908 1,206 61 5.1

Biggs saidIn this comparison, I have given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-rate separately and together, so that they may be compared either way with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist language, may I ask, if the excessive small-pox fatality of Japan, of the British Army, and of the Royal Navy, are not due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? It would afford an interesting psychical study were we able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would have soared with a corresponding result—but on the opposite side.

 TABLE 29.

Small-Pox Epidemics, Cost, and Fatality Rates Compared

Vaccinal Condition Small-Pox Cases Small-Pox Deaths Fatality-rate Per Cent Cost of Epidemic
London 1900-02 Well Vaccinated 9,659 1,594 16.50 £492,000
Glasgow 1900-02 Well Vaccinated 3,417 377 11.03 £ 150,000
Sheffield 1887-88 Well Vaccinated 7,066 688 9.73 £32,257
Leicester 1892-94 Practically Unvaccinated 393 21 5.34 £2,888
Leicester 1902-04 Practically Unvaccinated 731 30 4.10 £1,602

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

 

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

uk-smallpox-1838-1890

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

sweden-smallpox-1821-1852

14 Responses

  1. I just ask people how the powers that be could possibly have the omniscience to be sure that a tiny little protein didn’t exist anywhere on the planet when they made their claim that the small pox virus had been eradicated. I point out that it was obviously a fabrication (presumably to dig themselves out of the hole that the highly dangerous vaccine had created for them).

    That invariably shuts them up about small pox.

  2. This article is not peer reviewed at all. Notice how all of these studies begin in the 19th century when urbanization was on the rise. Smallpox, the most devastating disease in History was wiped off the face of the earth by vaccines. Yes there is a risk that you contract the disease from the vaccine itself, this is because the virus inside of the vaccine is active, it is not the smallpox virus itself but a related virus called vaccinia which replaced the Cowpox virus they had been using for vaccinations during the 19th century. There is In any case immunity tends to decline with age for ANY vaccine. As for the statistics regarding the historical outbreaks you mention I will refer you to this book. http://books.google.com/books?lr=&id=NQYAAAAAMAAJ&q=227#v=onepage&q=227&f=false

    [ED: Wow. How impressive. Another expert from the University of Google. And the link to Google books does not seem to work either.

    There is no helping some people: “Smallpox, the most devastating disease in History was wiped off the face of the earth by vaccines.“.

    That is completely false. It is the most extraordinary and unscientific untruth which has been peddled by the establishment for decades. So much for the touching faith in the discredited “peer review system”.

    It does not stand up to scrutiny as we have shown by reference to hard data. Yet this commenter demonstrates a comprehensive inability to read and assess the information provided.

    That serves to show how untrue unscientific claims can survive for two hundred years that smallpox vaccination was any use at all. It was not. It must have been the most useless medical measure in the history of medicine.

    It just goes to show the extent to which fear of disease can overcome human ability to reason and assess facts.

    Quite how the medical profession has been able for over two centuries to peddle this quackery is beyond belief.

    And we have the armed forces thinking they will be protected by a useless smallpox vaccine should an enemy weaponise the disease. It gives the lie to the term “military intelligence”.

    Or is the purpose to give the troops the false impression they will be protected?

    Gulf War Syndrome is a reason the British Royal Navy tipped all the vaccines overboard when the second Iraq War was started by the Bush family to make money for their wealthy friends in the military industrial complex which President Eisenhower warned the American people about in his valedictory address.

    Remarkable warnings were given to the American people by a President of the United States about a few corporations gaining disproportionate influence over the US Government and its agencies. Back in 1961 from his televised valedictory address to the nation Dwight D Eisenhower warned of the rise of the military-industrial complex and the dangers it spelt for the USA and for every American. Since that time Americans and the world have seen a parallel rise of the medical-industrial complex. The same game – just a small number of different players, playing you, The US Congress, The US Senate and The President of The United States, all at the same time, whilst in one way or another owning or controlling the US media. President Eisenhower in a speech he had wanted to give for two years and had to wait until the expiration of his presidential term in the middle of the 1956-1975 Vietnam War said:

    In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

    We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.

  3. […] Било која научна анализа или податоци назад во историјата се само дел од неоправданото внесување на било каква вакцина против големи сипаници. На следниот линк можете да прочитате колку ненаучни и смешни се тврдењата дека треба да се вакцинира против големи сипаници : Small Pox – Big Lie – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication и како вакцинирањето станува политичка алатка: Smallpox Eradication – One of History’s Biggest Lies & How Vaccination Did Not Eradicate Sma… […]

  4. This is AWFUL. Your sentence structure and punctuation are abysmal, making your unsubstantiated claims unreadable.

    [ED: That wins second prize for this month’s most ridiculous comment.

    Don’t you know you don’t use capital letters the way you have in the middle of a sentence. That is very poor literary practice. And on the internet of course it is the equivalent of shouting.

    If what you wrote in your comment were true you would write saying you could not understand pointing out the part you did not understand and exactly why you did not understand. As it is, you gave no examples of anything unreadable – which of course you cannot as none is unreadable.

    Thanks for the lazy drive-by comment.]

  5. […] vaccines actually spread smallpox, as discussed in detail by Dr. Mercola. It is said that the smallpox vaccine cannot have been responsible for the eradication of smallpox because only 10 percent of the population was ever vaccinated at […]

  6. […] vaccines actually spread smallpox, as discussed in detail by Dr. Mercola. It is said that the smallpox vaccine cannot have been responsible for the eradication of smallpox because only 10 percent of the population was ever vaccinated at […]

  7. […] information presented here sudgested that the die off was naturally occuring due to better hygiene. Check out the graphs in this […]

  8. […] vaccines actually spread smallpox, as discussed in detail by Dr. Mercola. It is said that the smallpox vaccine cannot have been responsible for the eradication of smallpox because only 10 percent of the population was ever vaccinated at […]

  9. Great article .. the truth must be known .. vaccines neither safe or effective .. as history has shown.. time & time again.

  10. Great info .. greatest hoax in medical history ..

  11. […] This article was originally published by Child Health Safety […]

  12. I would have read it, if I could have gotten past three B.S about Bush.
    Loony

    [ED: The most notorious well documented well publicised and inappropriate conduct by a US President in recent modern history is “BS” according to you. Obviously you have no idea it happened nor that Bush’s administration did it. What an idiot. Thanks for the drive-by.]

  13. While the vaccine itself may not have been the only factor that contributed to the eradication, it was more likely a combination of better healthcare, sanitation, and living conditions. Oh, and throw in the vaccine. Very few things in our biological world are ever fully effective. This is why we combine factors. To look at all of the information that was presented in this article and take it for face value is a tad preposterous. When one looks at statistics and other data, they must always question. What else was happening during this time period? Could there be anything else that would have added to the drop off rate, or to the death toll? Always ask yourself what is the author of this article trying to get across? Is this an informative article, or a persuasive article. Never accept anything for face value. Always educate yourself. Statistics can be misused or misinterpreted or even misrepresented.

    [ED: Thanks tb. Any vaccine which takes 100 years to “work”, clearly did not. No need to “throw it in”.

    More importantly in the present context, no matter how clear the evidence may be nor how clear the explanation, there will always be people who don’t read it properly or at all. You need to re-read. You have for example omitted that well-known phenomenon for infectious diseases – attenuation.

    This is what the article states:

    The demise of the disease came about as a result of the interaction of three completely different factors: isolation, attenuation and improved living conditions, particularly nutrition and sanitation. The effect cannot be attributable to the smallpox vaccine – any vaccine which takes over 100 years to work ipso facto proves itself not to have …..

    ]

  14. Never, in all of my life, have I read anything that is so completely misconstrued. Your article is proof that we can convince ourselves of anything these days. Your highly defensive tone in response to the comments does not, in any way, make your case seem more valid. Rather, such comments attest to the fact that you are misinformed and unwilling to consider differing opinions. I genuinely respect your opinion and admire the time you put into this research. I only counsel, however, that you be less quick to take offense to a counter argument for I fear that many will find your opinion to be precisely what you have accused the “institution” of having fabricated… that being “quackery.”

    [ED: Well Nick, we are not saying you are a troll but your comment looks like classic trolling.

    Why? Nothing you wrote comments on the content of the article.

    You start “Never, in all of my life, have I read anything that is so completely misconstrued.”

    If that were the case it would be easy for you to identify the key points you dispute. You fail to engage.

    Perhaps you should have written “Never, in all of my life, have I [ie. you] “read anything.”

    You commented without reading. That is obvious from the absence of any analysis and confirmed by your remarks.

    You mention not a single substantive issue. It seems misinformed and shows unwillingness to accept differing opinions may be valid.

    It does however provide an opportunity to point such matters out. For that our thanks.]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: