The anti-safety vaccine lobby galloping in red tunics and full cry with hounds let loose and running blind fell off the precipice and crashed into a bloodied pile in the deep Gorge of Stupidity down under in Australia. You can read about it here: Will the real Australian sceptics please step forward?
Yep, the mixed bag of various cranks and the kinds of nutters who follow the seemingly mathematically challenged “scientist” Dr David “Orac” Gorski did what they are best at.
Unhappy about Ms Meryl Dorey’s excellent work in Australia telling people the truth about how ineffective and unsafe vaccines can be for children and others, they started a legal case to attack her new venture “The Real Australian Sceptics“.
They claimed “Australian Skeptics” was their trademark [and so ignorant they even cannot spell "sceptic"] but just like their spelling failed to take into account what a trademark is and that they don’t have one. In a remarkable piece of “dumb-assed” cussedness they got themselves and their legal case trashed comprehensively.
Clearly one must be sceptical about “skeptics” [and probably a whole lot more than just that].
And is “thugs and bullies” an appropriate term? The Bolen Report spelt that out in technicolour recently.
You can read about it here: Australian Skeptics Dragged into Court over Rape, Mutilation, and Death Threats Against the Australian Vaccination Network Leadership… Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen Sunday, October 14th, 2012.
Such nice people.
Filed under: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Child Health Safety, Disease Statistics, MMR, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines Tagged: | ADHD, Anti-vaccine Safety, Aspergers, autism, Cervarix, Corruption, flu, flu shot, flu vaccine, fraud, Gardasil, GlaxoSmithKline, GSK, HPV vaccine, influenza, mercury, MMR, Pandemrix, Polio, swine flu, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines
THE INSTITUTE FOR NEARLY GENUINE RESEARCH
GENERATION RESCUE
INSIDE VACCINES
THE AGE OF AUTISM
The legality of that site has been in question since the moment it appeared, especially considering it was using a name and url very closely resembling something all ready trademarked under Australian law. If you went and called a burger restaurant “McDougals” you’d get the same treatment.