::
::
::
::
::
::
::
::
::
::
UK health officials have wrongly assumed the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine can prevent 70 per cent of cases of cervical cancer and press reports show “German experts said the assumptions simply did not stand up to scrutiny, and that women remained at risk“: Experts Cast Doubt on Claim for ‘Wonder’ Cancer Jabs Sunday Express 31 May 2009: Cervical cancer jabs cast into doubt after experts question effectiveness Scotland On Sunday 10th May 2009.
The HPV vaccine can have serious adverse effects with high levels of reported adverse reactions. Death and debilitating illness have been claimed but officials do not acknowledge an association.
Germany’s Robert Koch Institute, which makes recommendations on the public funding of vaccines, is reviewing its programme after 13 experts called for a reassessment of its HPV vaccination programme and an end to “misleading information” about the effectiveness of the jab. A spokeswoman said: “Because of the public discussion and some new reports and new statements from the 13 professors, the committee will publish a statement within the next few weeks.”
Dawn Primarolo MP for Bristol South since 1987
The UK’s New Labour Government has been aggressively pursuing the HPV vaccine programme in schools out of sight of parental control. Some consent forms reportedly have no decline option. There are anecdotal reports of young girls being cross-examined in school corridors by health officials on parental consent issues. British Health Minister Dawn Primarolo isclosely associated with the pursuit of the policy.
The Sunday Express reports Professor Martina Doren, of the Charitie Hospital in Berlin:
What concerns us is that the two manufacturers of the vaccine aren’t always using facts. They claim that a lot of high-risk strains of cancer-causing virus are protected against but equally there are others that are not. If protection is not more than 20 per cent then that is an awful lot of money to be spending, particularly as the vaccines have quite serious side-effects.”
A spokesman for GlaxoSmithKline, which makes Cervarix, was unable to provide figures on cases of pre-cancerous cells in women who have taken the vaccine, compared with those who have not.
Scottish Conservative health spokeswoman Mary Scanlon said: “Given this new research, it is now incumbent on the Scottish Government and the chief medical officer to review the vaccination programme to ensure that it lives up to the expectations of preventing cervical cancer.”
The HPV vaccine programme is based on recommendations of the UK’s Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation. This highlights questions over the competence of the UK’s JCVI to make recommendations on UK vaccination programmes and the competence of medical professionals in general to express opinions on scientific matters.
The JCVI has a documented history of recklessness over vaccination policy and a needle-happy reputation along with concerns about financial and other conflicts of interest: Secret British MMR Vaccine Files Forced Open By Legal Action but from April 1 this year has been given in unfettered control of UK Government vaccination policy for England: UK Government Hands Drug Industry Control of Childhood Vaccination. And as the British Medical Journal confirms Doctors are not scientists: Doctors are not scientists — Smith 328 (7454): BMJ.
If the vaccine is not effective, then its adverse effects cannot be justified but in the UK we see no official comment on the vaccine’s risk profile. This highlights how public safety issues fail to be addressed as a result of what some claim is a quasi-religious belief created by the drug industry in the importance of vaccines and the fear medical professionals have of making public criticisms on safety grounds.
The push for mass vaccination is driven by the commercial interest of the drug industry in moving to new business models. Financial markets have known for 20 years and more the pharmaceutical industry’s blockbuster patented drugs business model would eventualy fail
The Bill Gates’ Microsoft type business model is one of the emerging replacements – almost everyone has Windows software on their PC – almost everyone will be vax’ed. Gates quickly became a multi-billionaire. With vastly more people to vaccinate than computers requiring software the lure of money for the pharmaceutical industry is substantial.
Alongside the expansion of vaccination programmes the childhood prevalence of lifetime conditions like asthma, allergies, autism, diabetes and others requiring further medications have increased substantially.
______________________________________________________________
MORE NEWS STORIES 1/6/09 -
Rush to introduce vaccination throws up worrying questions – The Scotsman – 01 June 2009 By Marisa de Andrade
Fears over reactions to cervical cancer jab – The Scotsman – 01 June 2009 – By Marisa de Andrade
Call to review cancer vaccine after Germany demands more medical proof – The Scotsman – 2nd June 2009
______________________________________________________________
For detailed information and references on the German issues, see:-
Germany’s Robert Koch Institute is Questioning the effectiveness of the HPV vaccines
Holy Hormones, Honey! — The Greatest Story Never Told
Documents on HPV Vaccines Gardasil and Cervarix
Filed under: ADHD, Aspergers, Barak Obama, Child Health Safety, Disease Statistics, Hannah Poling, John Poling, MMR, Obama, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines, autism, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court | Tagged: ADHD, Andrew Wakefield, Aspergers, autism, Barak Obama, Baron Cohen, CDC, David Kirby, fraud, genetic, genetics, Hannah Poling, immunisation, jokes, Jon Poling, Julie Gerberding, MMR, Obama, Professor Baron Cohen, Professor Simon Baron Cohen, research, research fraud, Simon Baron Cohen, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine adverse reaction, Vaccine Damage, vaccine risks, Vaccines, Wakefield
Not only do we find that our politicians had their fingers in the public purse but their snouts feeding from the trough of big pharma.
It gets worse when you consider that people like Dawn Primarolo are not only gullible enough to acfcept all this junk and currupt corporate from big pharma but try to enfoce it on the rest of.
I can’t see Dawn Primarolo admitting she and her cohorts may put the long the term health at risk for hundrreds of thousands girls based on aggresive corporate marketing and bad science.
[...] Indiscriminate needle sticking http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2009/05/31/germany-hpv/ [...]
[...] Child Heath Safety [...]
I sent various pieces of specific vacine data with questions to my MP and he forwarded this to Primarolo. She replied with a kind of proforma that had little relevance to my data or questions; I sent additional data, she replied via that MP with the same proforma which of course had, by this time, virtually no relevance to my questions.
Neither my MP nor Primarolo provided what I would consider to be a satisfactory, or even relevant, response to my questions and the MP in effect did not even get involved, he merely “shuffled” the papers backwards and forwards.
These are people UK citizens entrust their children’s health and futures to.
[...] Child Heath Safety [...]
[...] Child Health Safety [...]
The biggest flaw in this vaccine that goes against known science is the series of three vaccines.
Most people survive the first shot, most the second and most the third.
But the people dying are usually those at the end of the series of three rather than at the first shot.
And the biggest flaw in their death is that the families probably aren’t linking the deaths to the vaccines. Doctors by now will be doing all they can to save this woman or young girl and will probably attract much praise from the family of the dying lady.
If after all this Russian Roulette they try to get recognition of harm they do not play Russian Roulette but they have the UK governments promise of two chances for recompense of which the best of the two chances is no chance.
The fact that we still use the vaccine shows that it must be “good” or the governments concerned are not good.
Anyone condoning three shots where one only is obligatory for safety should be put in prison for attempted murder.